McMahon Focusing On Retail Politics
by Scott Benjamin | Jan 30, 2012 6:29am
(5) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Congress, Election 2012
After gaining statewide name recognition by spending a record-setting $50 million and saturating mailboxes and airwaves with advertising during her first bid for the U.S. Senate two years ago, former World Wrestling Entertainment CEO Linda McMahon is now focusing on retail politics.
“Clearly it makes a difference that people know who I am,” said McMahon, who is seeking the Republican nomination for the seat being vacated by U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman. “We have many more endorsements than we had [at this time] during the last election.”
The 130 guests at a campaign event last week in Ansonia received a six-page list that included former gubernatorial candidate Tom Foley, several state legislators, municipal leaders, former state party chairmen and town committee leaders.
“From my observation, she has the edge in winning the convention,” said state Rep. David Scribner, R-Brookfield, who has not made an endorsement.
The other Republican candidates are former U.S. Rep. Chris Shays of Bridgeport, attorney Kie Westby of Southbury, attorney Brian K. Hill of Windsor, attorney Peter Lumaj of Fairfield and former Vernon Mayor Jason McCoy, who has technically suspended his campaign.
McMahon, who was considered an outsider two years ago when she ran for the seat that was being vacated by then-U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd, captured 51.7 percent of the vote at the GOP convention to 44.6 percent for former U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons, who was the early frontrunner, and 3.1 percent for Peter Schiff, the CEO of Euro Pacific Capital. Three months later she won a Republican primary with 49.4 percent of the vote.
It is expected that this year the nomination again will ultimately be decided in an August primary.
Scribner said that after establishing name recognition two years ago, McMahon’s early success this cycle is largely due to her personal interaction with potential supporters.
“She became known throughout the state with the commercials and fliers, but I heard a lot of comment from people who thought her advertising was excessive, and that it brought some negative attention to her wealth,” he said in a phone interview. “I think it is a positive development that she learned something from that and is handling her campaign now in a different, strategic way.”
Republican Party Chairman Jerry Labriola Jr., who has promised to remain neutral during the primary, agreed.
“I think Linda has taken stock of what worked in 2010 and what didn’t work and that evaluation has led to a lot of changes,” Labriola said. “She’s pretty much cleaned house and started with a new team.”
Former state Sen. Tom Scott, R-Milford, who led the revolt 21 years ago against the state income tax and then ran as an independent candidate for governor in 1994, is serving as her political director. She also has a new campaign manager and new communications staff.
Also, unlike two years ago, McMahon is seeking campaign contributions.
“It gives me access to a particular portion of the voters that I didn’t have the last time,” she said. “I think there were folks that wanted to contribute to the campaign [in 2010] and be part of it, so I said this time I want to be more inclusive,” McMahon added.
“There’s going to be a real effort to build this from the bottom up,” state Sen. Joe Markley, R-Southington, said. “I don’t think it’s so important how much money she raises, but the number of people that she gets to contribute.”
Former state Sen. Sam Caligiuri, R-Waterbury, who was the GOP nominee two years ago in the Fifth Congressional District after dropping out of the Senate race, said McMahon’s interpersonal communication skills are one of her biggest strengths.
“People virtually line up to speak to her and have their photo taken with her,” he said in a phone interview.
“They like to look you right in the eye and shake your hand,” McMahon said as she took a brief break last week from greeting her guests and posing for photographs.
“She connects with people better than anybody I’ve seen in my 30 years in the political world,” Markley said. “When she is talking to you, she really is talking to you, which is a rare thing in politics. Usually the politician is looking over your shoulder at the next person in line.”
Scribner recalled that in his initial meeting with McMahon two years ago they “talked for over an hour, and as we talked you could tell that she was focused on what I was saying and followed up with thoughtful questions. I saw that happen with other people throughout the campaign.”
“She is genuinely concerned about what’s going on in your life,” said Joseph Reese, a McMahon supporter from Watertown.
However, some of McMahon’s GOP opponents said her 2010 performance underscored that she isn’t electable.
They have said that in a Republican year she lost even though she spent an unprecedented sum of money and provided information for a New York Times story published three days before the Democratic state convention that her opponent, then-state Attorney Gen. Richard Blumenthal, had misstated his military service.
The national press initially pronounced Blumenthal’s campaign dead and then moved on after the crisis passed.
A Quinnipiac poll released five weeks before the election reported that McMahon only trailed Blumenthal by three points, but she ended up losing by 12 points.
“Blumenthal was exceedingly difficult to defeat,” Caligiuri said. “He had been on television several times a week for 20 years as Connecticut’s consumer watchdog and received very little bad press over that time. A candidate with that kind of operating base is almost unbeatable and I think Linda came as close as anyone could.”
“I definitely think that she can defeat Chris Murphy,” he said.
U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy is the apparent Democratic frontrunner in a field that also includes state Rep. William Tong of Stamford and former Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz of Middletown.
However, some of former U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons’ supporters complained two years ago that McMahon lacked command of the issues.
The most notable episode came in late September when at a news conference in which she was endorsed by the National Federation of Independent Businesses she said she didn’t know that Connecticut’s minimum wage was $8.25 an hour.
“She got better on the issues over time,” Caligiuri, who has not endorsed a candidate, said. “Her work ethic is strong and at this point she is well-versed on the issues.”
Over the recent months, McMahon has written op-ed columns on the congressional super committee on the federal debt and the Keystone energy project.
Perhaps most surprisingly, she lacked support among women, as one report indicated that Blumenthal took 60 percent of their votes, compared to 39 percent for McMahon.
There was speculation that McMahon’s weak backing from females was partly due to the sexually-suggestive content in her wrestling shows.
Shortly after formally announcing her second bid last fall, she began holding roundtables with women and has launched a Women For Linda Web site.
“I think women and men are interested in the same issues, and that is where are the jobs going to be, where is the economy going to be,” McMahon said.
“However, sometimes women multi-task,” she added. I’ve been a working mom. I’ve been a stay-at-home mom. I know exactly what that’s like and also know the pressure when you’re also in business with a full-time job.”
She said during the slow economic recovery more women have faced “pressures” as a result of having “kids who have graduated from college and cannot find a job and have to live at home, or kids that have a job that doesn’t pay enough, so they’re back at home.”
“I think a lot of women are jealous of her,” Seymour Republican Town Committee member Joyce Koslowski, who supports McMahon, said.
“Linda is intelligent and she’s made a lot of money,” she said. “I think some of them are intimidated by her.”
“I had the opportunity to introduce her to a group of professional women and they were very impressed with her,” Scribner said. “I think that will continue to happen as more women get to know her.”
Tags: Linda McMahon, Ansonia, U.S. Senate, Labriola, Scott Benjamin
(5) Comments
posted by: saramerica | January 30, 2012 10:47am
“I think a lot of women are jealous of her,” “Seymour Republican Town Committee member Joyce Koslowski, who supports McMahon, said.
“Linda is intelligent and she’s made a lot of money,” she said. “I think some of them are intimidated by her.”
I would comment but I’m laughing too hard to type. If the McMahon campaign thinks this is why women don’t like Linda, they have WAY bigger problems than I thought.
posted by: ... | January 30, 2012 1:33pm
Well, it is probably why Joyce Koslowski is not (and will probably never) run for Senate. I doubt McMahon’s people would agree with her either (she wouldn’t doing any favors to her campaign if she agreed with that line of thought).
Put it this way: Right now she’s being ‘introduced’ by Republican state Reps. and part leaders to primary voters (i.e., other Republican voters). More women are getting to know her yeah, its just this time they get to pick between Her, Shays, and a cluster of lesser known candidates.
posted by: Reasonable | January 30, 2012 3:49pm
I agree with Joyce Koslowski, and favor Linda a winner this time. She was an inexperienced political novice last time when she faced one of the most seasoned and shrewdest politicians in the country—in Richard Blumenthal, and still gave him a run for his money. I think her chances against Christopher Murphy, “a President Obama coat-tailer,” re excellent. Only another greatlady candidate in Barbara Bysiewicz
could prove to be a difficult opponent for Linda McMahon to defeat.
Don’t sell the gals short, in a match against the “the good old boys club,” that have left this country in a virtual state of bankruptcy.
Women are experienced in meeting budgets. Men are not good at budgets, as evidenced by their massive budget spending in Congress. We MUST start breaking up this good-old boys spending club, as we are up to our eyeballs in red ink, with this irresponsible male gender lot.
posted by: saramerica | January 30, 2012 7:17pm
@Reasonable - I’m the last person to sell women short. I reason I commented was because of the incredible cluelessness of Joyce Koslowski’s comment, which DOES sell women short, by assuming the only reason they don’t like Linda is because they are “jealous” and “intimidated.” There are plenty of reasons for intelligent thinking women to dislike Linda McMahon (and any other intelligent political candidate who might have made a lot of money) besides being “jealous”. It appears Joyce Koslowski still has the mentality of a middle school mean girl instead of an astute politician.
posted by: Reasonable | January 31, 2012 11:46am
Saramerica: You say you are the last woman to sell women short, yet you buried Joyce Koslowski, by stating: “It appears Joyce Koslowski still has the mentality of a middle school mean girl, instead of an astute politician.”
“You would not be so bitterly-short-with-her, if she was a Democrat, Sarah!”.
Please try to believe in fair play. Kudos to Joyce Koslowski!
Have a nice day!