Murphy Challenges McMahon To Focus On Issues
by Christine Stuart | Sep 25, 2012 1:53pm
(8) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Congress, Election 2012, Taxes
Chris Murphy believes the race for the U.S. Senate should be about the issues voters care about, rather than his personal finances and tardy tax payments. But his Republican opponent Linda McMahon believes he needs to answer some tough questions about the rate he got on a home equity line of credit after his brush with foreclosure.
In order to make sure the questions about his personal finances weren’t lost on the media, the McMahon campaign sent volunteers to Bushnell Park carrying signs which called upon Murphy to release his personal loan documents.
But Murphy believes he’s answered all the questions about his personal finances and his relationship with Webster Bank, which gave him the loan back in 2008 while he was a member of the House Financial Services Committee. As for the tax payments, Murphy eventually paid them, and his rent, too. But he said it’s hypocritical of McMahon to call him out on tardy tax payments when she also forgot to make tax payments on a condo in Stamford.
The Courant published a story Tuesday reporting that McMahon has been late paying her property taxes on her Greenwich home four times since 1984. The news comes after the Associated Press reported that Mr. and Mrs. McMahon were six weeks late this month paying taxes on a Stamford condo.
“Here’s my challenge to Linda McMahon: Now that your hypocrisy has been laid bare, will you join me in making the campaign about anything, about something that matters to the people of Connecticut?” Murphy said.
“The hypocrisy in Congressman Murphy calling for an issues-focused campaign is staggering,” Corry Bliss, McMahon’s campaign manager shot back, Tuesday in a statement.
“Chris Murphy clearly doesn’t want to acknowledge it, but the fact that he is a corrupt, career politician in full cover-up mode has become one of the biggest issues of this campaign,” Bliss said. “For three weeks, Congressman Murphy has ducked reporters and refused to give any straight answers about his swirling ethics problems. Now, he is blatantly ignoring multiple calls to release his documents.”
Murphy, who is also a three-term Congressman, said voters deserve to know the difference between him and McMahon on taxes. He said he doesn’t support another round of tax cuts for millionaires. McMahon supports keeping the Bush tax cuts in place and her economic plan released at her last press conference in March assumes the Bush tax cuts will stay in place.
The McMahon campaign alleged that Murphy is the one being hypocritical because he’s been in elected for more than 5,000 days and “has failed to release a jobs plan to address the top issue on the minds of Connecticut voters: jobs and the economy.”
“Here’s what voters want: They want an election that’s about them,” Murphy said Tuesday. “They want an election about the issues that matter to them on a daily basis. Taxes, education, health care, war, and peace.”
Murphy said McMahon has not held a press conference in months to take questions from the news media. McMahon’s access to the media was limited from the beginning of her 2012 campaign. Instead of allowing questions after her announcement, her staff scheduled one-on-one interviews with reporters. The strategy may stem from a 2010 press conference that ended abruptly after McMahon refused to rule out reducing the minimum wage.
A much better candidate than in 2010, McMahon has steered clear in this election cycle of big press conferences where reporters can ask questions on a wide range of issues and topics. The last one she held was in March to unveil her economic plan.
“It is frankly no surprise that Linda McMahon is using baseless, despicable, personal attacks against me and my family,” Murphy said. “She is scared to death that this election may actually be focused on my record of fighting for Connecticut’s families and her record of fighting for absolutely no one except for herself.”
He said if the campaign turns back to focus on the issues, “McMahon loses.”
“That’s why she’s going to try and keep the media and the voters focused on personal despicable lies, rather than on the issues,” Murphy said.
State Rep. DebraLee Hovey, a Republican from Monroe, said this past weekend that she believes the McMahon campaign is right to highlight Murphy’s personal financial issues.
“I think it has a lot to do with his moral character,” she said, adding that life is busy and you follow the rules to the best of your ability, but she believes her constituents would not have gotten as favorable a rate as Murphy received.
As for McMahon’s bankruptcy, Hovey said it was 36 years ago.
“The mistakes of our youth can’t be judged overly harsh,” she said. “She’s more than made up for it.”
Murphy disagrees, but in order to keep the spotlight off his personal finances he’s going to need to also keep the focus off her personal finances.
Murphy refused to give one inch on the debate over whether he received a favorable interest rate. He refused to talk about the issue any further with reporters and declined to give out any more information.
“Her campaign said the other day that talking about the issues is a ‘senseless exercise’,” Murphy said. “Well, Linda McMahon’s right about that. For her talking about the issues is a senseless exercise. It’s a prescription for her to lose this campaign. She’s resorted to lies to smears to personal attacks every hour of the day. We’ve seen it before. She did it two years ago to Dick Blumenthal.”
The problem for Murphy, who is neck-and-neck with McMahon in the latest public polling, is that he’s not Blumenthal.
As a three-term congressman from the northwestern portion of the state, Murphy isn’t as well known statewide as Blumenthal. According to the Aug. 28 Quinnipiac University poll, 32 percent didn’t know enough about Murphy to form an opinion about him.
Tags: Linda McMahon, Chris Murphy, personal finances, bankrutcy, dh
(8) Comments
posted by: MGKW | September 25, 2012 3:03pm
Yep, the voters are owed that…but McMahon will not do that because she does not know or does not care to know the issues. Of course, Republicans have amnesia or talk about forgiveness when it comes to her past…sex violence, blood money to finance her campaign—-if it were not so pathetic it would be laughable. She is one of the most ethically challenged candidates in CT history.
posted by: CitizenCT | September 25, 2012 9:25pm
Chris, practice what you preach. We don’t exactly see you running on your record of accomplishment. Maybe it’s because you have accomplished nothing during your six years in office.
posted by: MGKW | September 26, 2012 8:36am
“Linda McMahon’s record of marketing sex and violence to women and children for profit disqualifies her permanently from representing Connecticut in the US Senate. The Journal Inquirer recently reported that McMahon is paying a former FEC official large fees to threaten legal action against the paper for truthfully reporting on McMahon’s use of child porn for profit, as well as misuse of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) funds for her campaign.
Specifically, the Journal Inquirer reported that WWE teamed up with a porn company, “Girls Gone Wild,” (GGW) to produce a nude, pay-per-view event involving young girls who stripped in front of cameras, for the shared profit of WWE and GGW. Linda says she didn’t know the children’s ages. But there’s no way to separate WWE from GGW on the question of profit from porn entertainment. Politico noted that the founder of GGW had praised GGW’s “incredible partnership with the WWE.” They shared in the profits; they share the blame.
WWE is notorious for demeaning women. For example, as reported by both Politico and Connecticut Day, during one broadcast McMahon’s husband Vince was shown in the wrestling ring comparing a female performer to his dog “because the bitch did everything I told her to.” McMahon then told the performer to get on the ground and bark like a dog, before compelling her to disrobe. What does this suggest for women?
WWE is also known for the mistreatment of staff, in two cases possibly leading to the deaths of performers. We haven’t seen the last of this. Now the question is whether McMahon unlawfully commingled WWE money with her own money to support her campaign. Whatever the FEC may decide on this, either way, porn-derived funding is once again driving McMahon’s bid for the Connecticut seat in the US Senate.”
CTCitizen, again she is trying to erase her past hoping voters will forget what she has done…you complain about Murphy’s ethics? Really? McMahon has alot to answer for but, hey, she is just a businesswoman who wants to lower taxes, and eliminate regulation and create job…suggest you check your gut, again!
posted by: Bolder63 | September 26, 2012 9:46am
How this man can claim to stand for anything is beyond me, he is absolutely shameless and will say anything to keep living off the public trough.
As far as “fighting for Connecticut families” he fought for nothing but Obama’s failed policies that are crippling this state and the rest of the country. I have had enough of say one thing and do another ‘professional politicians’ Linda will represent the people of this state honestly, a concept Murphy is totally unfamiliar with.
posted by: CT Jim | September 26, 2012 9:59am
@Ct citizen, I’ve been at numerous press conferences and rally’s for Chris where that’s all he does is talk about what he’s accomplished during his years in public service. As for Linda she wont even speak to the media because she’s done absolutely NOTHING for anyone except herself. I suspect hiding behind a pile of money will only last so long. Lets hope she wants to talk about what she plans to do to us as senator. I’m sure it’ll be to line up with her tea party base.
posted by: MGKW | September 26, 2012 10:10am
Note to Bolder63…
Again you are blissfully ignoring the character and ethics of this “candidate” and forgetting her past…if your conscience is OK with that I suggest you look in the mirror.
posted by: CitizenCT | September 26, 2012 8:59pm
CT Jim, Thanks for the input. Can you share with us anything Murphy’s accomplished in six years as a congressman? Can you give us one piece of legislation he championed that went anywhere? Does he explain why he voted to send the USA into default by voting against raising the debt ceiling? Does he say why he voted against the defense appropriation act last July, critical for defense jobs in CT, that was supported by CT’s four other democrats in congress? Murphy is a lazy follower of Nancy Pelosi and other than aligning with Dirty Harry Reid, nothing else would change if elected to the senate. Linda works tirelessly and has more upside potential for CT.