Social Networks We Use

Facebook Twitter

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut E-Book Customers to Receive More Rebates
May 23, 2013 8:26 am
Attorney General George Jepsen announced that e-book publisher Penguin has agreed to a price fixing settlement that...more »
3rd Annual Connecticut-Israel Technology Summit Set for June 12
May 17, 2013 3:03 pm
The MetroHartford Alliance and the Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford have announced the third annual...more »
CTNext Launches Startup Map
May 5, 2013 12:29 pm
CTNext, a public/private partnership helping the high tech startup community in the state, launched an interactive map...more »

Tag List

OP-ED | 2012 Legislative Session: Winners and Losers

by Susan Bigelow | May 11, 2012 8:42am
(7) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Opinion

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Susan Bigelow The hectic, productive and contentious 2012 legislative session’s a wrap, finally! That was an incredible amount of action for a short session. Now that everyone’s gone home exhausted, all that remains is to figure out the winners and losers. So without further ado:

Winners

Liberals — In a country where progressive reforms have been rolled back in many states, Connecticut has been busy outlawing the death penalty, allowing same-day voter registration, and making medical marijuana legal. Yes, the education reform debate left a bad taste in many liberals’ mouths, and the minimum wage and a few other bills didn’t make it this year, but on the whole what we’ve seen in Connecticut is two straight sessions of progressive advancement. Connecticut liberals haven’t had it this good at the state level in a long, long time.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy — He didn’t get everything he wanted, but the governor still had a very good session. “Over the course of the last 16 months we have pushed more change through these two chambers than has occurred in Connecticut in a long, long time,” Malloy said, and he’s right. Malloy still has to contend with low approval ratings and lingering hard feelings from the education reform debate, but his first two years have largely been a success.

Education reformers — It could have gone much worse. The education reform bill seemed to teeter on the brink, but in the end a compromise passed with near-unanimous support. More aggressive reformers might feel the changes weren’t broad enough, but they’re an excellent step. Now the challenge is to make sure that education isn’t put on the backburner again.

Unions — There was a distinct whiff of anti-union sentiment to the original education reform bill, but in the end the teachers unions were pleased with the bill that passed. Two other big pro-labor bills, one a controversial initiative allowing home- and day-care workers who are paid through state programs to bargain collectively and the other allowing the requirement of project labor agreements by public entities, passed. Unions may have had a disastrous 2011, but 2012 was an awful lot better. 

Drunks — Sunday liquor sales. That is all.

Losers

Party harmony — Democrats in the House and Senate are pointing fingers at one another over the failure of two signature bills: the Senate’s jobs package and the House’s minimum wage increase. These aren’t the only cracks in the Democrats’ armor, though; the large Democratic majority felt plenty of strain over issues ranging from the death penalty and education reform to Sunday sales of alcohol and campaign finance reform. In a party this big there are bound to be splits and tensions, and they were definitely on display this session.

Republicans — Only sort of, though. Republicans didn’t win a lot of (or any) victories, but they seemed a lot more together this session than in previous years. Republicans made stands on issues that they believe are winners for them, like the busway, the death penalty, and medical marijuana, and they may be able to capitalize on irritation with Hartford out in a few marginally Democratic districts this fall.

Budget hawks — Remember last year when the budget was balanced and everyone felt good? What happened to that? This year, Gov. Malloy and the Democrats were embarrassed by an ever-increasing deficit and were forced to delay the implementation of GAAP — a key Malloy campaign promise. They also increased spending, which, in light of the deficit problems, looks like Democrats trying to have it both ways. Republicans were quick to pounce on spending hikes and what they said were some fishy maneuvers to close the gap.

Who do you think the winners and losers were?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

(7) Comments

posted by: wmwallace | May 11, 2012  5:42pm

The winners were the democratic politicians, unions, and special interest groups who will benefit from this budget.

The losers are the taxpayers who are footing the bill for all this excess spending.

posted by: Todd Peterson | May 12, 2012  10:40am

wmwallace: You nailed it.

posted by: ALD | May 12, 2012  3:28pm

The winners were 49 other states as the Democrats in Hartford continue their unrelenting quest to chase as many jobs and people out of here.

posted by: CitizenCT | May 12, 2012  5:12pm

Winners:
Murderers
Pot smokers

Losers:
Taxpayers, as Malloy can’t balance the budget after the largest tax increase in state history due to out of control spending.

posted by: GoatBoyPHD | May 12, 2012  10:42pm

GoatBoyPHD

Losers:

The private sector working class: failure to pass minimum wage and various medical care expansion packages targeted at the working poor fell by the wayside.

Students: The academic reforms were timid coming out of the gate and will certainly lead to No Child Left Behind and Sheff sanctions in 2013 as the legislature loses control of the schools.

The Pension Funds: returns for the FY were 1.13% at the 9-month mark. The market is down 3% since and CT is likely looking at a negative return for the FY. Far short of the mythical 8.25% assumptions. Can you say “CT Junk Bonds” boys and girls? I knew you could.

Winners:

As is usual, sex and drugs are the opiate of the working classes in CT. It’s certainly not religion. Marijuana and alcohol got easier to procure with fewer legal restrictions.

Sanity: John Lender is doing a round up of the latest haz duty pension and OT fiascos. If the Romeny Recession becomes a reality watchout. Based on Joe Lieberman’s figures we would need to increase Federal taxes 20% and reduce spending 25% to return to historical norms.

posted by: ALD | May 13, 2012  6:40pm

GoatBoyPHD,  Speaking of Liberman’s figures, isn’t it so telling why this country is in the mess those we send to Washington have put us in.  He has to wait until the last few months he is in office to try to introduce the kind of legislation tht he should have had the guts to introduce all his career.  If there isn’t a bigger reason for term limits for all members of Congress I’ve never heard of it.

posted by: jiddum | May 15, 2012  5:57pm

Winners: CBIA, CIGNA, and Aetna who want to monopolize insurance and keep people from having options, no matter the consequences to the general public. Losers: the uninsured, working poor, and small businesses who our leaders recklessly failed to help get access to affordable, quality healthcare. Governor Malloy didn’t want any part in sensible, cost-effective reforms like State Basic Health Program, the consumer-friendly Exchange board re-composition, and the small business health care bill and our Senators lacked the courage or the leadership to stand up and speak out for their constituents.