Social Networks We Use

Facebook Twitter

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut E-Book Customers to Receive More Rebates
May 23, 2013 8:26 am
Attorney General George Jepsen announced that e-book publisher Penguin has agreed to a price fixing settlement that...more »
3rd Annual Connecticut-Israel Technology Summit Set for June 12
May 17, 2013 3:03 pm
The MetroHartford Alliance and the Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford have announced the third annual...more »
CTNext Launches Startup Map
May 5, 2013 12:29 pm
CTNext, a public/private partnership helping the high tech startup community in the state, launched an interactive map...more »

Tag List

OP-ED | Building the Wrong Road

by Susan Bigelow | Apr 20, 2012 8:40am
(8) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Opinion

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Susan Bigelow In Salem, Connecticut, there’s a highway that stops in the middle of nowhere. If you’ve ever driven from the Hartford area to the beaches of southeastern Connecticut or Rhode Island, you know the one I mean. Route 11 is a fantastic, traffic-free, four-lane divided highway right up until the moment the unwary driver is spit out down an exit ramp and onto narrow, dangerous, two-lane Route 85. It’s been like this for forty years.

The legislature is once again taking a stab at finishing the impossible road, and re-igniting controversy over tolls in the process. I have to give them high marks for persistence. Governors, legislators and members of Congress have repeatedly banged their heads against Route 11 for decades, to the point where the exhumation of the highway’s corpse by way of some new plan or other has become a perennial tradition. Last year a bill to put tolls on Route 11 to fund its completion was passed by the House only to die in the Senate. It’s back again this year, passed recently by the Finance, Revenue and Bonding committee, though whether there’s enough votes or time for it to reach the governor’s desk is anyone’s guess.

Route 11 is one of these things that looks like an easy fix. We know exactly what we need to do: finish the road. Right? It all seems so simple. The cuts in the mountain are already there. Get out the steamroller, evict a few hapless locals from their homes, grab some asphalt, and in a couple of years we’ll be able to shave a full 10 minutes off our drive to New London. Progress!

Except it’s not that simple, and it hasn’t been since the heyday of run-amok highway planners back in the 1960s and early ‘70s. Funding is hard to get and the review process is excruciating, meaning projects can languish in limbo for decades. Finishing a major transportation project requires an enormous act of political will at the local, state and federal levels. The tolls may, if they succeed, solve some of the funding problems — though as Rep. David Scribner, R-Brookfield, suggested, a high pricetag could mean the tolls don’t pay off for decades.

All of this begs the question of whether we’re doing the right thing at all. Does a big rural highway project like this still make sense? Is it environmentally sound? What will happen when we re-introduce tolls to the state after so long? Does Connecticut actually need this road? There are other ways to get to New London, after all. Nothing ever is as easy as it seems.

Route 11 is just a minor blip on the legislature’s radar this session, dwarfed by bigger fish like liquor sales on Sunday and education reform. The latter seemed like it might be a relatively straightforward thing, at first, too. Reform tenure to get rid of bad teachers and allow the state to take over failing schools in order to turn them around: not easy, but straightforward. Of course, a more thorough analysis has shown it to be anything but, and the bill has subsequently been dragged down by its own complexities and the competing interests of various stakeholders. At this point it’s barely reform at all. Gov. Malloy has threatened to veto the bill as is, and it’s hard to blame him. Closed-door negotiations are ongoing, but whether anything will be agreed upon before the session ends is, again, anyone’s guess.

Like Route 11, at some point we need to seriously ask ourselves if this kind of education reform is the right way to go. Do the government’s turnaround models produce good schools and students who can achieve? Do we want to get bogged down in this endless debate over standardized tests, tenure and teacher evaluation? Will any of these actually fix anything, or will we just wind up at a dead-end, stuck in the middle of nowhere, a couple of years from now? In other states where these reforms are being implemented, people are starting to ask themselves the same questions.

There’s no doubt that we need some kind of education reform, and we need it desperately. But maybe this road isn’t the one we want to build after all. Should we be focusing instead on fundamental skills like reading and math, smaller schools, smaller class sizes and more individual help for students? Should we be looking at social and environmental factors? Before the governor, the legislature and the teachers’ unions drag this fight out into the summer, they should consider whether there is something better they can achieve instead. Maybe, just as there is for the phantom unfinished section of Route 11, there’s another, less direct but ultimately more worthwhile way to get where we want to be.

Susan Bigelow is the former owner of CT Local Politics. She lives in Enfield with her wife and their cats.

Tags: , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

(8) Comments

posted by: GoatBoyPHD | April 21, 2012  3:12pm

GoatBoyPHD

I foresee a Foxwoods Mohegun consolidation at some point after the Mass and NY casino plans are fully developed. Pfizer announced its plans years ago.

The Norwich New London metro had phenomenal growth from up until the highway was complete averaging 25% bumps two decades in a row in the 50s and 60s.

The Naval Base and Elecric Boat are the largest employers in the Groton area.

I think a doom and gloom scenario for the region is more likely than a growth scenario. New London County’s 6 largest employers make up over 20% of the direct employment in the area and the economics for further expansion of those 6 are lousy.

Teh sub base is gone in the next round of closures.  Foxwoods and Mohegun are one casino too many w/ consolidation waiting to happen. Pfizer pulls out completely. EB will be a skeletal staff if the base closes. Then there’s the indriect employment ripple.

CT needs an expanding job base in winning industries.

posted by: Noteworthy | April 21, 2012  8:01pm

I wholeheartedly agree. Shaving 10 minutes off a sometimes trip to New London isn’t worth a tinker’s damn or the tolls and money finishing this unneeded road will require.

Likewise, you hit the nail on the head. We do not teach the basics well, nor do we intervene early enough in the lives of poorly performing students. Handing tens of millions of dollars in no-bid contracts to Malloy’s charter chums is not the answer. And I get the creepy feeling listening to the “reform” crowd that they are throwing stuff against the wall, hoping it sounds good and telling everybody it’s “proven to work.” But with so much money at stake - I’m thinking that’s a lot of BS and perhaps simple is good. Simple like back to basics - how to write cursive instead of print; read well, comprehension, grammar as well as writing content and math. Our kids can’t sign their name nor do they know the difference between a noun and a verb. Want to know what’s wrong with education today? Start there.

posted by: Reasonable | April 22, 2012  9:33am

Connecticut is building the wrong road, as the voters ELECTED THE WRONG PERSON AS OUR GOVERNOR.

We did it to ourselves!

posted by: gerardw | April 22, 2012  4:25pm

As long as the US Navy needs submarines Electric Boat will go on. There’s too much infrastructure to move economically, and any sub vet will tell you EB boats are significantly better built than the Newport News ones ... the primary reason the Navy feeds NN sub contracts is too keep EB from having a monopoly.

posted by: StunningContradiction | April 23, 2012  11:23am

There’s nothing dangerous about Rt 85 so why would you say something like that?

posted by: Matt W. | April 23, 2012  2:26pm

Matt W.

The Route 11 project is a tremendous waste of time, effort and money. I drive it everyday and it simply could never support the kind of traffic that would be required to justify the expense.  If we never built that little 10 mile stub, we wouldn’t even be discussing this but the desire to throw good money after bad is often too powerful for us to resist.  You wanna spend a billion dollars?  Rebuild our bridges and re-pave some roads.

posted by: Reasonable | April 24, 2012  8:51am

Matt W.: Rebuilding our bridges and roads reflects a necessary common sense. Unfortunately, Connecticut voters elected a politician who only pushes projects that are “politically correct” for his reelection psychology. The majority of voters picked Mallloy as our Governor—AND WE ARE ALL PAYING THE PRICE FOR IT.

posted by: Reasonable | April 24, 2012  10:59am

GoatBoyPHD: Our problem is that our elected state government is counter-productive to a needed expanded job base in winning industries.

The people in Connecticut have failed “to light a fire under their elected officials,” and as a result, they are allowed to be complacent about trying to secure new industries in Connecticut.

Also, our elected officials have passed too many laws, with additional taxes, that discourage new industries to open in our “tax-unfriendly state.”

Our biggest problems in Connecticut—are our internally created problems, which must be corrected, before the state can start doing business, once again.