OP-ED | Bysiewicz The Populist
by Susan Bigelow | Dec 9, 2011 11:14am
(8) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Opinion
“I don’t think I have ever been popular or a favorite with the party insiders because I fight for the people, even when it’s not always on issues the party wants me to take,” Susan Bysiewicz said recently during her travels around the state from one DTC to another.
It’s a weird, head-scratching kind of thing to say for someone who had seemed, for a decade and more, to be one of Hartford’s most visible and entrenched Democrats. But this has not been a normal year for Susan Bysiewicz, who is trying to ride a wave of anti-corporate rage past U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy to capture the Democratic nomination for Joe Lieberman’s Senate seat. Bysiewicz, who this week released a plan to “hold Wall Street accountable” for the financial crisis, seems to be hoping running to the left of Murphy and appealing directly to the people will be enough to carry her back to elected office, and undo the damage of a disastrous 2010. She may even be right.
Bysiewicz, long a favorite among Democrats in Hartford, was Secretary of the State from 1999 through 2011. During those years she always seemed more like an insider waiting to be tapped for higher office than a crusading populist. She made two abortive runs for governor in the 2006 and 2010 elections, dropping out of the 2006 race to seek another term as Secretary of the State, and switching to the attorney general’s race in 2010. Her platforms in those races were largely uninspiring, and she put forward few ideas to separate herself from the pack. Her campaigns in the 2000s seemed more like Democratic boilerplate than the work of a political outsider.
Her new campaign, though, has tried to be populist right from the start. Bysiewicz embraced an immediate total pullout from Afghanistan and Iraq and slammed Murphy as a pro-corporate Washington insider who supported renewal of the Patriot Act. The attacks are a bit of a stretch, but they’re emblematic of the new, tough, outspoken, aggressive Susan Bysiewicz. The “Plan to Hold Wall Street Accountable” she released this week strikes a similar tone: the surprisingly gripping accompanying video of Bysiewicz driving from Middletown to Wall Street while reeling off grievances ends with her saying “Unlike most politicians, I didn’t come [to Wall St.] for a fundraiser.” It’s an evocative and attention-grabbing close, and echoes a slam David Cappiello used against Chris Murphy in 2008. The ad also echoes the concerns of the Occupy Wall Street movement; when asked about the occupiers, Bysiewicz’s campaign said, “Susan thinks that the Occupy Wall Street protests are an outgrowth of the frustration that so many Americans are feeling about both the wealth divide and lost opportunities in this country.”
At first glance, Bysiewicz’s outspoken populism may seem like a rather obvious political ploy to grab some attention in a sleepy race so far dominated by Chris Murphy and the looming specter of Linda McMahon. But maybe this is something deeper. To find the outsider candidate, we have to go back to 1998 and the primary she ran against Ellen Scaletter for the Secretary of the State nomination. Scaletter won the endorsement of the party at the convention, but an unfazed Bysiewicz came after her hard during the primary season. Bysiewicz attributed her loss at the convention to her support of then-unpopular campaign finance and ethics reform: “Those are issues that don’t win you the support of party insiders, because it lessens their control over the process and changes the balance of power,” she said. Her opponent was a fellow member of the legislature, and both of them agreed on the vast majority of issues, but a combination of attack ads and Bysiewicz’s outsider claims vaulted her to victory.
History has a way of repeating itself. Once again Bysiewicz isn’t the party favorite, and once again she’s running a bare-knuckles campaign from the outside. Bysiewicz’s campaign manager dismissed strong DSCC and national Democratic Party support for Chris Murphy by saying “She’s taken on some tough fights [and] doing those types of things—standing up to the insiders—doesn’t necessarily make you popular.’’ Bysiewicz’s populism is certainly resonating with some Democrats; she’s already earned endorsements from some Democratic Town Committees.
Whether this populism is the whole truth of Susan Bysiewicz is another issue. I’d have to wonder where it’s has been for most of the past decade, for one thing. Also, outspoken, political outsider Bysiewicz doesn’t sound like the same woman whose office kept a huge, fishy database of Connecticut voters, many of which had annotations about personal preferences from clothes to political candidates. Her statement on Occupy Wall Street is still somewhat cautious, and when asked if she thinks the Obama administration should have taken a tougher stance on Wall St., she expressed support for Dodd/Frank and the Volcker rules, though she did add that, “We need to do a lot more.”
So is this honest populism, crass political opportunism, or a mix of both? Whatever is driving Susan Bysiewicz, expect her to fight hard for the nomination all the way through next August. Chris Murphy should consider himself warned.
Susan Bigelow is the former owner of CTLocalPolitics and an author. She lives in Enfield with her wife and cats.
Tags: Bysiewicz, populist, Susan Bigelow, Secretary of State, U.S. Senate, Democratic Party
(8) Comments
posted by: ... | December 10, 2011 10:39am
I’d say it’s more of the latter. She was fairly effective in here state office enough to be re-elected for over a decade. But at face value, that fact puts her far from the idea of being an outsider to government and politics. She was also a member of the legislature during most of the 90s. This puts her in-government experience far longer than Murphy.
Murphy has been in government just as long too, however he has made his trip perhaps more gradual trip through the legislative line (from state to national congress).
All in all though, this just seems like an attempt to keep some embers glowing before the media blitzes of the 2012 primaries.
posted by: Todd Peterson | December 10, 2011 12:04pm
Crass political opportunism is the sum total of everything this woman is about.
This hideous woman didn’t even bother to make sure she fulfilled the statutory requirements for the AG seat before she entered the race. She would have been an absentee AG anyway because the US Senate is where she wanted to be all along.
She and Murphy are birds of a feather looking for the next higher office to seek. Murphy just happens to be less crass and ruthless in his pursuit; his largely manufactured “aw shucks” shtick keeps the faithful smiling along with him as he follows nancy Pelosi’s marching orders.
Susan Bysiewicz and her ilk on both sides of the aisle ARE the problem. She is an empty skirt in need of a thorough dry cleaning. Go away, Susan, for the people’s sake.
posted by: GoatBoyPHD | December 10, 2011 2:14pm
Is Suzie ready to go head-to-head with former Democratic Senator Jon Corzine? The Corzine hearings are an embarrassment. $1.2 Billion in customer money gone and no one knows where it is?
Certainly not Murph.
The scary thing: Corzine was considered one of the brightest US Senators when elected in 2000 and has zero visibility or transparency into what went wrong at MF GLobal in his 20 months as CEO there. Draw your own conclusions on the visibility he had when passing government legislation. Likely just as clueless.
Global MF took a US Senator and put him in charge thinking they can skim $1.2 Billion of client money, bankrupt the firm, and get away with it because Corzine is one of the Democratic boys.
Friday it’s revealed George Soros purchased MF Global’s bad paper at steep liquidation discounts. That leaks out and the bet is on European fiscal sanity for the short term. So the Market rallies.
Is Suzie really ready to go against this crowd of financiers that breaks banks, hedge funds, and countries, and picks up the pieces at steep discounts?
So far the Senate has been completely outmaneuvered which sadly is looking more and more like by design incompetence.
Senate Insider Trading and post-political careers fronting financial scams?
IS she going to challenge Biden on the BAPCPA act of 2005? The single worst piece of consumer law passed under Bush and designed to protect Joe Biden’s leading business constituency—the Credit Card companies?
http://tinyurl.com/77fmgfu
I haven’t heard a whimper out of CTs Democrats. It’s going to take a little more than photo ops with OWS tents and a drive down Wall Street.
It would be so much easier if the politicos from CT got together and said they are in over their heads. Completely.
posted by: Careful | December 10, 2011 3:44pm
Chris Murphy’s stance as a Pres. Barack Obama “rubber-stamp” will come back to haunt him. Susan Bysiewicz “hasn’t sold her soul,” and should be a winner!
posted by: Careful | December 10, 2011 8:28pm
Todd Peterson; You recognize Chris Murphy for what he is, “but calling Susan Bysiewicz a hideous woman is a cheap shot, which gives you dubious creditability.”
Name-calling—will get you nowhere, as it does not impress intelligent readership.
Try keeping it civil, Todd Peterson.
posted by: GoatBoyPHD | December 11, 2011 9:57pm
“60 Minutes” is all over the Nancy Pelosi story and the 200% return on her Visa IPO shares and her industry favorable Credit Card Reform bill.
http://tinyurl.com/7uez8kv
Last week: Michael Moore headlines—Big Problem ‘If Wall Street Already Has Their Man And His Name Is Barack Obama’
Obama’s biggest contributors: Wall Street.
“They have their lackey” says Moore.
http://tinyurl.com/br7laoc
What is Suzy really going to do? Blame it all on the GOP? Take a drive down Wall Street? A photo op at an OWS tent?
posted by: Careful | December 15, 2011 8:29pm
GoatBoyPHD: Wall Street helped Obama amass his $1 billion dollar reelection campaign fund.
posted by: Todd Peterson | December 18, 2011 1:26pm
Well, careful, I’m sorry if you don’t like me calling Susan Bysiewicz hideous. It is a harsh thing to say but I think she’s losing because of the very reasons I call call her that. A few of these reasons are highlighted in this op-ed.
I agree with Ms. Bigelow that Bysiewicz does act like a woman who expects to be tapped for higher office. She is completely and totally self-absorbed. Her “populist” posturing can’t change that.