OP-ED | Municipal Elections Winners and Losers
by Susan Bigelow | Nov 11, 2011 1:27pm
(10) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Opinion
Well, the 2011 municipal elections are in the books. I’ve been busy searching for signs, portents and trends in the results, but there aren’t a lot to be found. Maybe the story of this election was just how unremarkable it was. Both parties generally won where they’re supposed to; Democrats in the cities and some of the older suburbs, Republicans in the small towns. There were few upsets or surprises. I’m reminded of the election of 2007, which was similar in being a mixed bag for the parties without any clear trends.
But we can still take some useful points away from Tuesday’s elections, so without further ado, here’s the winners and losers roundup!
Winners
Small/Medium City Democrats – In 2005, the big story was Republicans kicking out entrenched Democrats in Connecticut’s small to medium-sized cities, such as Torrington, Middletown, New Britain and Norwalk among others. Some of those gains were reversed this week as New Britain, Manchester and Middletown returned to the Democratic fold. And if you don’t think most Democrats are excited about booting Michael Jarjura from office in Waterbury, you haven’t been paying attention.
Incumbents – That said, election nights are usually a good night for incumbents, and 2011’s election was no different. About two dozen towns changed hands between the parties out of nearly 160 towns in play. Where was the anti-incumbent sentiment we’ve been told to watch out for? At the town level, anyway, it’s not really present. There’s also the distinct possibility that the lingering crisis of the recent storm and endless blackout helped keep some incumbents in office, but more on that later.
Gov. Malloy – This man never slows down. Malloy and Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman popped up at Democratic victory parties across the state on Tuesday night. Malloy clearly relishes his role as head of the Democratic party far more than former Gov. M. Jodi Rell did as head of the Republicans, and the sort of party-building he was engaged in this election season should help him establish strong links to towns and make the Democrats stronger. He also helped sell the idea that Democrats won the night, despite some evidence suggesting it was a wash.
Working Families Party – Love them or hate them, there is no political party quite like the WFP in Connecticut, and they had a good night Tuesday. They won all three minority council seats in Hartford, shutting the moribund Republicans out completely, and helped rack up votes for cross-endorsed Democrats in several other cities and towns.
Post-Outage Morale – Can I just say how excellent it was to walk into the high school and vote after a week and a half of blackout and crisis? It felt wonderfully normal. There were some questions about whether elections should be delayed in some towns, but I’m glad they were held.
Losers
Chris Healy’s Legacy – The GOP under Chris Healy was notable for a few things, specifically an ability to win municipal elections in smaller cities, special election wins, and a strong social media presence. Republican social media, such as the @ctgop Twitter account and their blog The Everyday Republican were crucial for up-to-the-minute information in years past. However, Democrats are starting to take back those cities, Republicans did rotten in recent special elections, and the official Republican presence on social media has faded. I checked in on their Twitter account on election night only to see a bunch of updates about what Chairman Labriola was doing. Zzzzz. How about some election results, or some big wins on Democrats’ turf?
Turnout – Due to the storm cleanup and lingering power outages, voters stayed home in droves. Turnout was lower than in previous years, especially in towns hit hard by the storm. The low turnout is another reason why it’s so hard to draw any larger conclusions from this election.
Storm-fueled anger – That said, there was speculation that voters angry at how the epic botching of the storm cleanup by CL&P would show up and take their frustrations out on elected officials. This didn’t happen. If anything, effective town responses may have helped local incumbents in places like Simsbury and Enfield.
Blogs – There used to be a network of town-focused blogs and other websites keeping track of elections. Now, Twitter, Facebook and a very few other online news sources are the go-to places for immediate election results. I like the constant flow of information on Twitter, but something seems missing.
That’s what I’ve got for Election 2011. What do you think? Let us know who you think the winners and losers were in the comments!
Susan Bigelow is the former owner of CTLocalPolitics and an author. She lives in Enfield with her wife and cats.
Tags: town hall, municipal, elections, 2011, Democrats, Republicans, suburban, Susan Bigelow
(10) Comments
posted by: ... | November 11, 2011 5:20pm
While perhaps Blogs have lost their sway as a go-to source for immediate news, I think the importance of CT’s Patch websites should be noted. It was the first place I found official results of my local elections, hours before the Hartford Courant. Perhaps small run, but well connected organizations like Patch are replacing some of the more partisan (and therefore more driven) blogs of our state.
posted by: Commuter | November 11, 2011 7:43pm
Not bad. Nothing’s missing though. Since the days of Local CT Politics (wasn’t that your blog?) and the scattering of micro blogs across the state, we’ve got professional efforts like this one and ctmirror, as well as much more respectable efforts from the traditional channels. Things have developed substantially over the last five or six years, and show every sign of accelerating.
posted by: Susan Jane Bigelow | November 11, 2011 7:44pm
I do find Patch interesting and useful, but the fact that they’re owned by AOL makes me wonder how long they’ll last. Local online news sources have historically struggled.
posted by: craigmm | November 12, 2011 1:27pm
There was one surprising big loser that you didn’t mention - Bristol. Two-term Democrat Mayor Art Ward barely survived a challenge from a Republican with zero political experience, and two incumbent Democrat city councilmembers got booted. What had been a 4-2 Democrat city council is now a 5-1 Republican city council. What happened?!
posted by: GoatBoyPHD | November 12, 2011 2:44pm
Blogs are struggling as are message forums. The switch to devices without a physical Qwerty keyboard is changing the environment.
Then there’s the high price of phone plans with data limits. Why waste it on ad heavy blogs and political sites? WA reversion to the mean where the average person reads or watches the news 20 minutes a day.
And, shudder, there’s that group of under 30s who don’t find any of this stuff cool or trendy or necessary. They had their first Microsoft Office and Internet Class in High School 1996 as Sophomores and are bored with the whole internet thing. They’d just as soon have a Kindle Fire and a Droid Phone and do the social media thing and use Skype to video their friends. The Facebook, Twitter, YouTube generation that doesn’t own any physical media (CDs, DVD,s or Books) and doesn’t read all that much anyway. Th
ey use their precious bandwidth to stream.
“Charlie Don’t Surf” to borrow from Joe Strummer.
posted by: Todd Peterson | November 13, 2011 1:40pm
As to the Bristol results, it may have been a case of the Republicans working harder to turn out the base.
Art Ward was pretty frank about his party’s town committee not doing enough to get the party faithful out. From what I read the Bristol GOP made thousands of get out to vote calls and generally outhustled the Dems. It could be that the Dems thought that Ward’s recovery from the choking incident created enough goodwill to carry the election. If that’s the case then they were wrong.
posted by: ocoandasoc | November 13, 2011 3:30pm
Patch was a winner—nice to have timely local writeups on the muni elections. The City of Hartford was a loser again. Dismal turnout and another undistinguished council that will only deepen and hasten the city’s descent.
posted by: ... | November 13, 2011 6:52pm
I was unaware AOL owned Patch. That is certainly an interesting figure, especially if profits are a primary desire of AOL to keep Patch running. I’ll maintain confidence though they’ll push through.
posted by: wmwallace | November 14, 2011 3:48am
The usual pro democrat and anti republican spin from you, what a shock. By the way I got a ton of info from the patch on election night results I didn’t get elsewhere.
posted by: William Jenkins | November 14, 2011 10:45am
“Republicans did rotten in recent special elections”
Did it ever occur to you that every, single special election in 2011 was a Democrat seat? Republicans winning any of those is huge, Republicans winning none of those is a draw. Democrats losing two of them is “rotten” for them.
You really need to learn how to take an unbiased look at reality. Opinion pieces like this are fine but when they are laced with inaccuracies, it significantly reduces their impact.