OP-ED | Sunday Booze Ban: The Dumbest Law In The Land
by Terry Cowgill | Feb 11, 2011 3:30pm
(5) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Opinion
If misery actually loves company, then Connecticut must have a very special bond with Georgia and Indiana. Those two states, with far different cultures than ours, are the last to stand with us in banning stores from selling alcoholic beverages on Sunday.
Looking for fixes to a projected $3.7-billion budget deficit and spurred by predictions of $3.6 million in revenues per year from additional sales and use taxes, lawmakers, along with mayors of the state’s three largest cities, are mounting one last effort to defeat a small special interest that exercises great influence disproportionate to its actual numbers.
At a legislative hearing Tuesday, representatives of both sides trotted out the usual arguments: package stores near state lines are at an unfair disadvantage; Sunday sales will drive small package stores out of business; the government has no business telling retailers which days of the week they can be open.
All the other New England states repealed this ridiculous statute years ago. How can it be that in Connecticut — not exactly the most religious state in the nation — we cling to Blue Laws that ban certain types of behavior on religious grounds?
Connecticut has come a long way since the 17th century, when Gov. Theophilus Eaton crafted a set of Puritanical laws banning everything from adultery to wearing clothes trimmed with gold.
Blue Laws banning large store openings in Connecticut were repealed decades ago, but statutes prohibiting off-site alcohol purchases have been in effect since the days when Rev. Eaton’s laws made it illegal to “travel, cook victuals, make beds, sweep house, cut hair, or shave on the Sabbath day.”
And perhaps someone can tell me why the state, in its infinite wisdom, deems it fine for its residents to stop by a local watering hole to quaff a few beakers, but unacceptable to buy the booze at a package store and bring it home.
As for the proposed legislation, guess who’s opposing it. The package store owners themselves. It seems counterintuitive that any business would want the government to forcibly restrict its hours of operation with the effect of sending business out of the state. But the liquor store owners’ lobbyist in Hartford, the Connecticut Package Stores Association, has succeeded in thwarting Sunday sales several times during the past five years.
The association, which represents 1,100 mostly mom-and-pop stores in 168 of the state’s 169 municipalities, insists that Sunday hours will increase revenues only slightly. But, of course, they don’t really care about the tax revenues anyway.
The association insists that its members will be forced to open on Sunday or lose business to those who do. Spokesman Carroll Hughes estimates 300 package stores would close because of the competitive threat posed by super markets that are already open on Sundays. And for those package stores that are able to remain open, it will cost them an extra $14,000 a year to open the extra day.
As Mr. Hughes well knows, no one is “forcing” anyone to do anything. Under the proposal before the General Assembly, Sunday openings would not be mandated. If the extra expense of hiring a clerk to work time-and-a-half on Sundays isn’t worth it, then stay closed. That’s just simple microeconomics.
Reluctant package store owners insist that they would be compelled to open on Sundays because of the competitive threat from the stores that do. Perhaps, but you could say the same thing about convenience stores or barber shops. Maybe the package store owners could explain why they deserve special protections from competition that others do not enjoy. They won’t be able to do that because there is no plausible explanation.
It’s time to repeal a silly law rooted in religion and protectionism. Let Georgia and Indiana carry that distinction alone.
Terry Cowgill blogs at terrycowgill.blogspot.com and was an award-winning editor and senior writer for The Lakeville Journal Company. He is host of Conversations with Terry Cowgill, an hour-long monthly interview program on CATV6 on Comcast’s northwest Connecticut system.
(5) Comments
posted by: wmwallace | February 11, 2011 9:09pm
You do realize this will hurt the small package store owners. That is why they are against it. They will have to open up on Sunday or risk losing customers. The big box stores are open already so this is a win win for them.
Anything to get more tax dollars, no matter what it does to society.
posted by: ... | February 12, 2011 4:07pm
Except the big box stores don’t sell hard alcohol or wine, so I’m unsure how this is a huge ‘win win’ for the big box stores.
We were a state known for opposing the ban of alcohol altogether in the 20s/30s.
Now we’re known as one of only three states in the union restricting the consumer’s access to alcohol for a the sake of a law originated as a way to regulate our lives (which was the purpose of Blue Laws in CT).
posted by: Aldon_Hynes | February 13, 2011 10:58am
It would seem as if a store that is afraid of losing customers because their competition is open one day more than they are must be starting off with pretty low customer satisfaction.
posted by: hawkeye | February 13, 2011 12:27pm
JonessAC12: Don’t get frustrated, as the Connecticut General Assembly will pass Sunday liquor sales, and Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, said he will sign the bill, once it reaches his desk, and we need the tax revenue.
posted by: and 1 | February 13, 2011 1:55pm
Well water is wet- rocks are hard and business is business. I live 5 minutes from the NY border and believe our tax dollars are better spent here on a Sunday than in another state (we could use the money even more than they can). If mom and pop stores are not interested in working then perhaps they should come up with another deal - maybe they could have specials on Friday and Saturday so that folks buy up all their booze then. However the could also employ someone who is happy to work on Sundays.