Social Networks We Use

Facebook Twitter

CT Tech Junkie Feed

Connecticut E-Book Customers to Receive More Rebates
May 23, 2013 8:26 am
Attorney General George Jepsen announced that e-book publisher Penguin has agreed to a price fixing settlement that...more »
3rd Annual Connecticut-Israel Technology Summit Set for June 12
May 17, 2013 3:03 pm
The MetroHartford Alliance and the Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford have announced the third annual...more »
CTNext Launches Startup Map
May 5, 2013 12:29 pm
CTNext, a public/private partnership helping the high tech startup community in the state, launched an interactive map...more »

Tag List

Shays Gets Aggressive, McMahon Deflects

by Hugh McQuaid | Jun 14, 2012 3:22pm
(4) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Election 2012

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Google

Hugh McQuaid Photos Thursday’s Republican U.S. Senate debate wasn’t a dull one. Christopher Shays took repeated shots at Linda McMahon’s experience as the former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment while McMahon answered virtually every attack by focusing on the economy.

The debate, held at the University of Connecticut and hosted by the Courant and Fox 61, was the first since McMahon won the Republican endorsement at the state GOP convention. It also came on the heels of a Quinnipiac University poll, finding that McMahon had closed to within three points of Democratic frontrunner Chris Murphy. Previously, Shays had been more competitive against Murphy.

But the poll also found that McMahon’s experience as a wrestling corporation executive continues to be a liability among voters. And Shays wasn’t pulling punches on the subject during Thursday’s debate.

Meanwhile, McMahon diligently tried to keep her focus to the economy. She argued that the state’s next senator should be someone with job creation experience.

“The experience that is necessary to grow the economy and grow jobs are from the job creators. Not from a professional politician who has been in Congress for 20 years,” McMahon said.

In his response, Shays managed to both compare McMahon to Playboy magazine publisher Hugh Hefner while also bringing up the early deaths of some professional wrestlers.

“The economy is huge, but a job creator? Hugh Hefner is a job creator . . . What types of jobs did you create? What about the 41 people who have lost lives before the age of 50?” Shays asked.

The candidates were asked questions spanning a number of topics, including whether they believe Republicans were waging a war on women’s reproductive rights. Shays said he didn’t think so. A social moderate, he said he believes women have the right to choose whether to have an abortion. But he quickly turned the question into an opportunity to bring up the WWE.

“I think when you force a woman to take off all her clothes in an arena and get down on the ground and bark like a dog, I think that’s an assault on women,” he said, referring to a WWE performance where McMahon’s husband, Vince, makes a female wrestler disrobe and bark like a dog.

“She calls this a story. I call it an outrage,” Shays said.

One of the debate moderators told Shays he had gone off topic and gave McMahon a chance to respond. She said she was proud of the business she had grown and the jobs she created at the WWE, and then turned the conversation back to the economy.

“We have big issues to talk about. We have issues about the fact that people’s homes are being foreclosed upon, rates going up every day. Issues about people being out of work,” she said.

Asked to answer the question regarding women’s reproductive rights, McMahon said she didn’t see a war on women.

“I think that that’s a myth. We do have, I think, the war that’s going on is a war on the people of America because we don’t have them working and our economy is continuing to stagnate,” she said.

McMahon said that she was proud to have helped reform the wrestling industry during her tenure at the WWE. But Shays said that she had ulterior motives for reform.

“Reform the industry? Once you decided to run for the Senate and you didn’t want all those gross things that were happening through your time of the business you’re saying you’re proud of,” he said.

Most of the questionable WWE material was removed from sites like YouTube during the early months of her 2010 campaign. At the time, the WWE said the videos were removed over copyright infringement.

Following the debate, McMahon acknowledged she wasn’t looking to engage Shays on his criticisms of WWE programing.

“I’m really not going to focus on that. I’m just going to keep coming back to the issues because that’s what’s important . . . That’s what’s on the minds of the people of the Connecticut,” McMahon said.

Meanwhile, Shays said McMahon has no answers for her business.

“Compare her values to my values and I can’t imagine hardly any Republican voting for her,” he told reporters.

Shays said he’s not sure whether voters will care about McMahon’s role in the WWE when it comes time to cast primary ballots.

“I care. That’s one of the reasons I’m running,” Shays said. “I believe you need someone with experience to get the job done.”

Tags: , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share |

(4) Comments

posted by: MGKW | June 15, 2012  12:26pm

With all the money that she is spending she is hoping that the voters of Ct will magically have amnesia about how she made it.

She is hoping that she will be perceived as a grandma and an upstanding member of the community.

Really? Her money is tainted, she characterized WWE as family entertainment,and her “so-called” jobs program was what caused the financial meltdown and the depression that we are in.

Blumenthal beat her by 12%. Murphy will wipe the floor with her on the debate stage based on both intelligence and likability…

Yes,
It is pornagraphic that she is running for the Senate for a second time!

posted by: purplehaze15 | June 15, 2012  4:08pm

Linda is not a liability among voters. She was right on the meassage during the debate and all Shays did was try to rip on her past WWE connections, as far as that goes? WWE is not a issue here, the economy, jobs,and someone that hasnt become a washington insider after twenty one years. This state needs new energetic blood, not more of the same that has been dragging CT taxpayers down, making business and residents leave and yet they wonder why in Hartford..stop taxing us to death and spending more then we have..it is not rocket science.Go linda.

posted by: lisalake | June 15, 2012  6:12pm

Pathetic, whiny, desperate, anger-laced display by RINO “I vote 40% with the Democraps”, Chris-Cross Shays….! Someone forgot to tell Chris the party is changing. No moderates needed.

posted by: Reasonable | June 17, 2012  1:12pm

Chris Shays is “telling the truth! He says “we need someone with experience to get the job done.”  Linda McMahon’s wrestling business experience isn’t the kind of experience “that will cut the mustard” in our very difficult economic times.

“The McMahon theme is to knock and blame Shays as one of the people who got us into this mess”—yet Shays was one of the last elected Congressmen who gave us a balanced budget…“and our deficit spending has sky-rocketed since he left office!”

We need Shays back in office—as a proven elected official—WHO KNOWS HOW TO GET THE JOB DONE!

Electing Linda McMahon “is like taking a shot in the dark,” and we can’t afford to gamble—“when our country is besieged and on the road to bankruptcy!”

We must elect qualified people like Shays!.