State Park Fees Doubled Last Year, Will Revenue?

by Chase Carnot | Mar 10, 2010 6:35pm
(2) Comments | Commenting has expired
Posted to: Environment, State Capitol

Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

Chase Carnot photo Advocates presented their case for rescinding fee increases at Connecticut’s state parks at the state Capitol Wednesday.

“Most citizens in the state have no idea that this has happened,” Eileen Grant, president of Friends of Connecticut State Parks, said.

Fees at Connecticut’s state parks doubled last October as part of the budget. Parking at many state parks now costs Connecticut residents $20. Camping costs $26 a night.

Some people may consider a season pass but those have gone from $50 to $100. Gillette Castle State Park, Dinosaur State Park, and Fort Trumbull State Park are covered under a different season pass which now costs $100 as well.

Chase Carnot photo “Our fear is that if we raise fees too much, we will completely undermine getting people into these parks,” Leslie Lewis, director for WalkCT, said.

Lewis said that her group was established to get Connecticut to take advantage of its state parks. “We are hoping the fees are rolled back to make these parks available for our families.”

Jim Little, director of development for Connecticut Forest & Park Association, said his group’s mission is to conserve Connecticut. “One of the ways we can do that is by connecting people to the land.”

“Because of the budget crisis,” said Little, “what is happening is the state parks and state forests are being underfunded.”

The groups executive director, Eric Hammerling, lamented the increasing expense to enjoy the state’s parks.  He said the group supported “moderate” fee increases with less “sticker shock” for Connecticut residents.

“We would have supported a 20 or 25 percent increase but not double,” Hammerling said.

Chase Carnot photo The Department of Environmental Protection estimated that the fee increase would bring in an additional $11 million this year. But according to CFPA, the result of the 100 percent increases has been a 40 percent decrease in camp reservations. This means that a twofold increase in fees will not translate into a twofold increase in revenue.

“At Sleeping Giant State Park, people drove up to the gate, heard how much it was, parked on Route 10 and walked in,” Hammerling said.

Lewis said that state park fees increasingly fall on the shoulders of poorer communities, particularly those in coastal communities with many private beaches.

“To deny recreation to poor family, that is appalling,” Grant added.

Some parks don’t collects fees though. “Those parks that don’t collect fees will get disproportionate use and that will cause maintenance problems,” Hammerling said.

According to Grant, staff at all the state’s parks total 90 people, while currently there are 7 to 8 million visitors a year. This means that much of the maintenance will fall on the volunteer groups that visited the Capitol Wednesday.

CFPA and Friends of Connecticut State Parks believe that the higher prices will also reduce the number of campers from surrounding states and negatively impact tourism.

Share this story with others.

Share |

(2) Comments

posted by: TJ | March 10, 2010  9:39pm

I worked at a state park last summer as a seasonal worker. Many visitors didn’t even like paying the non-doubled fees, so I can’t imagine what the response will be come Memorial Day weekend if this isn’t changed. Also, when you count the seasonals (I believe they hire about 200 a year, but I might be off a little), then there are certainly more than the 90 year-round staff quoted in the article. However, the parks are still understaffed, and the number of seasonals hired has been going down each year.

posted by: DrHunterSThompson | March 12, 2010  11:23am

In a word, No.

revenue will go up, but attendance will be down.  these fee increases will hurt tourism and keep many, like me from visiting parks with fees.

this really is part of the problem with the legislature, they jump on the wrong side of any issue when any significant analysis is necessary.

they should keep fees stable or even reduce them to entice tourists to connecticut where they can buy gas, go out to dinner, attend concerts, museums, etc. and provide tax revenue from those resources.

we need new leadership so badly….

HST