Senate Candidate Talks About Past Contributions
Opponents React
by Christine Stuart | October 9, 2009 10:16 AM
Posted to Election 2010

Much has been made by Republican party insiders about Linda McMahon’s contributions in past year’s to the Democratic party and President Barack Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
McMahon, the now former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment, is one of the five candidates vying for the Republican nomination in the 2010 U.S. Senate race, against incumbent U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd.
The tens of thousands of dollars given to the Democratic party and Emanuel is simply the cost of doing business, McMahon said Thursday night following a meeting of the candidates at a Windsor restaurant.
“I’ve been the CEO of a publicly traded company, which has given money to both Democrats and Republicans,” McMahon said.
McMahon said it had nothing to do with politics or personal beliefs. She said she has known Rahm Emanuel’s brother, Ari Emanuel, for years.
Ari Emanuel runs a talent agency in Hollywood, California, which does business with WWE, she said. She said he called up and let her know his brother would be in Stamford and “may do a little arm twisting.” She said when she gave money to Emanuel, he was still a Congressman from Illinois, not the current president’s chief of staff.

Some of her opponents for the Republican nomination struggled with the explanation Thursday night.
“For me it’s not just business,” former U.S. Congressman Rob Simmons said.
McMahon gave $15,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee between the years of 2006 and 2007. Emanuel was head of the committee during the 2006 midterm election cycle.
In a hard fought campaign, Simmons was defeated in 2006 by U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney by 83 votes.
“I’m disappointed somebody would be working against those efforts,” Simmons said.
State Sen. Sam Caligiuri, another candidate for the Republican nomination, who was standing next to Simmons at the time took the opportunity to add his opinion to McMahon’s campaign donation history.
“We don’t need another person who puts expediency over principle,” Caligiuri said.

Simmons said McMahon’s donations undermined his efforts in 2006 and allowed his opponents, who are now expanding government to win elected office.
But McMahon and her husband Vince didn’t only give to Democratic candidates.
In 2006 and 2008 the McMahon’s gave about $8,000 to former U.S. Rep. Chris Shays, a Republican from the Fourth Congressional District, who lost his seat to U.S. Rep. Jim Himes during the 2008 election cycle.
McMahon painted herself Thursday night as a different kind of candidate. One who is not indebted to the special interests or Washington elite.
She opened up her remarks by asking the crowd of Hartford, Bloomfield, and Windsor Republicans if they were going to elect and Republican and Dump Dodd in 2010. The room responded by saying “Yes.”
She said she cannot sit on the sidelines anymore. And her main focus, she said, is the economy and growing jobs.
“I think Connecticut needs a different kind of senator,” she said.
She said she knows Dodd will be a formidable opponent and will probably raise about $25 million. She said she’s funding her own campaign and will not be taking PAC or special interest money. She will however accept contributions of $100 or less from individuals.
“I will be in this campaign matching, dollar-for-dollar what it takes to retire Dodd,” she said.

Tom Foley, the Greenwich businessman also vying for the Republican nomination, said he also isn’t going to be taking any PAC money. He said he knows Dodd will be “very well-funded,” but doesn’t believe he will raise $25 million.
Foley, who has already raised about $1.7 million, most of which is his own money, said he hopes to raise $10 to $15 million to mount his campaign against Dodd. He said he expects to raise a majority of the money from supporters.
Caligiuri says he is running a truly grassroots campaign and will also not accept special interest of PAC money, even though he knows he has a significant fundraising disadvantage. Caligiuri believes his message will carry his candidacy.
Peter Schiff, the financial investor from Weston, was unable to attend Thursday’s forum.

Comments (6)
Posted by: Kate | October 9, 2009 4:09 PM
I'm a proud member of Republicans for Obama - and, if she wasn't so annoying about trying to squirm out of why she did it - I'd say that knowing she donated to Obama makes her go up a notch in my book!
Posted by: City Hall Watch | October 9, 2009 5:18 PM
Quite frankly, I like Linda. We could use a little less partyism and a lot pragmatism. These others guys get down in the weeds so much, all they can see is their navel. It's not always about party...it's about getting something done. Down with hot air and up with getting it done.
Note to Simmons: You didn't lose because of money. You lost because you weren't a very good representative that got things done.
Posted by: ACR | October 10, 2009 9:45 AM
>>good representative that got things done.
Not according to those in his former CT House district, nor anyone who had a dealings with him from his former congressional dist.
Quite the contrary in fact as I witnessed state rep. Rob Simmons show up at a retirement roast, do 10 minutes or so of pretty funny stuff and then hang around for a good 30 -45 minutes writing himself notes on the backs of small paper plates and stuffing them in his hip pocket. Once the constituent sees their rep write something down - you KNOW that constituent expects their rep to take action.
Simmons could have done the more usual for such events; glanced at his watch and taken off out the door immediately after he put down the microphone claiming he had some important place to be.
He didn't pull that guff at all.
My wife and I hadn't a clue who he was at the time and we both remarked on our way home that whoever that guy was we hoped he was one of ours because he sure looked like he was working for his district to us.
It's a very tough district for a Republican to hold and you might recall Courtney won by less than 100 votes.
BTW - Courtney speaks well of Simmons as does Simmons in return.
Ideological differences aside; neither is a dishonorable individual nor does politics require a constant drone of personal attacks.
Posted by: John DeBarbieri | October 12, 2009 9:57 AM
The race in Connecticut looks really interesting. Mrs. McMahon brings new face, hopefully new ideas and she has experience with performers at work when the outcome is scripted. Look at our current politicians in Washington and tell me they are not performers.. They used to legislators once in awhile, but now they have become performers for sound bites and recognition. Doing their job has dropped lower on the things to do list!
Posted by: ms.mary | October 12, 2009 12:43 PM
I think Linda would bring new and fresh ideas to the senate.She knows how to tell it like it is.
Posted by: TheNibbler | October 13, 2009 3:39 PM
So far I am for Linda - we need more pivate citizens to get into government rather than lawyers and recycled politicians (like Simmons)