Recent Comments

City Hall Watch wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “When New Haven went through re…”
cedarhillresident wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Walt thanks and doug too. I kn…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “"Legitimatically".WOW, I inve…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Reevaluation means different…”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rowland Gives Blago Some Advice
    • Rell's Deposit
    • The Fate of Newspapers
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Atlantic Wire Pleads Guilty To Polluting Branford River
    • Hunger Striking Prisoner's Dream of a
      New Trial Won't Come True This Year
  • Education
    • Lobbying Season Starts Early At Capitol
    • UConn Hires Alternative Energy Experts
    • Cosby's message: Responsible parenting
      wrapped in hope and empowerment
  • Election 2008
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
    • No Censure, Just A Letter Of Disapproval
    • Dems Expected to Scold Lieberman Today
  • Environment
    • Hartford Landfill Closes
    • Is That Toy Safe?
    • Hartford Marathon Goes Orange and Green
  • General News
    • 35 Cents An Hour = Cleaner Dishes
    • Memories From 2008: A Year In Review
    • We Know We Promised
  • Health Care
    • Quizzed on Health Care
    • State Officials Insist Husky Network Is Adequate
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
    • Jobless Numbers Are Up And The Phone Keeps Ringing
    • Union Members Honor State Veterans
  • Legal
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Lawmaker Requests Inmate Information
    • Blumenthal May Stop Suing
  • Local Politics
    • WPCA Urged To Tackle Marshal Fees
    • Who Has The Power To Appoint?
    • Marshals' Sweetheart Deals Targeted
  • Media Matters
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • WTIC Layoffs Have One Sponsor
      Questioning His Support
    • New Blog Emerges In Troubled Times
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • CTNewsJunkie wants your opinions
    • Curious Delivery Made To Press Room
    • Op-Ed: Speaking Out Against A Constitutional Convention
  • State Capitol
    • Preparing For The Legislative Session
    • Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
      & Give Us Choices
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
  • Transportation
    • Rell: Scale Back Rail Project
    • TSB To Study Tolls

Q-Poll: Three Strikes is Out But Fix Parole

by Christine Stuart | November 7, 2007 5:50 PM
Posted to General News

A Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday found Connecticut voters support the death penalty for persons convicted of murder 63 - 27 percent, but 75 percent of voters say their opinion has not changed as a result of the murder of three members of a Cheshire family.

While their views of the death penalty may not have changed, the poll of 1,029 voters found 60 - 33 percent have less confidence in Connecticut’s parole system.

And for all the hype about a stronger three-strikes law following the Cheshire murders, the poll found only 35 percent of voters support a so-called “third strike” law where a person convicted of three violent felonies automatically is sentenced to life in prison, while 63 percent say sentences should be decided on a case-by-case basis. Republicans at the state Capitol are unlikely to give up their support of a tougher three strikes law, (a sign calling for a three-strikes law is on display outside the GOP’s third-floor offices in the state Capitol) and Democrats are holding up the poll results to support their parole reforms.

Senate President Donald Williams and Senator Thomas Gaffey said the poll supports their proposals to appoint a full-time professional Board of Pardons and Paroles, restricting the use of reentry furloughs, and providing inmate files to board members at least one week before a hearing or meeting to consider the suitability of an inmate for parole release.

And to reduce prison overcrowding, 48 percent of voters say build more prisons, while 39 percent say release inmates earlier. But only 47 percent of voters want to pay higher taxes for new prisons, while 50 percent are opposed.

By a 62 - 32 percent margin, Connecticut voters are willing to pay higher taxes for more community supervision of offenders. “While voters are divided over whether they would pay more in taxes to build more prisons, they would pay higher taxes for more community of supervision of parolees,” Poll Director Douglas Schwartz said in a press release.

The poll also found voters still approve of Gov. M. Jodi Rell. Voters approve 77 - 14 percent of the job Rell is doing. In 16 Quinnipiac University polls since August 2004, Gov. Rell has slipped below 70 percent - to 69 percent - just once.

“Gov. Jodi Rell has held the highest approval rating for the longest time of any public official we’ve ever measured. She seems to defy conventional wisdom,” Schwartz said.

To read the entire Q-Poll click here.

Comments (1)

Posted by: MICHAEL J ROCCI | November 8, 2007 12:07 AM

Q,
The way I read the numbers it seems that the July horror in Cheshire changed 25% of the pollees minds on the death penalty. But you choose to view it as 75% did not. Don't you believe that changing the minds of people on this serious issue is monumental to say the least?
Also, This is not a political issue, not democrat, republican or otherwise. This is a human issue, but you constantly refer to republicans say this and democratats say that. Why not just name names and keep party affiliation out of it? I mean what's the differance, if the Petit's were of one party or the other..none!
Your polling is well received and enlighting, but for GOD'S sake keep the politics out of this one. Think as the victoms here and don't try to spin the results towards any policical party. It deserves respect all by itself without your opinion on what the numbers reveal. People are smart enough to figure out what your polling numbers mean for themselves. They don't need your imput on this issue.
We are talking about peoples lives here, who knows who could be next or where or when. The only opposition to the Three Strikes Law is by the career criminals, their poor families and greedy defense lawyers. This is no comparison to all others who care about the safety of themselves and their defenceless families.
With all due respect, yet dissapointed,
Michael J Rocci
Cheshire
203-272-6121
P.S. Let whomever know, I'm will not only to pay my fair share for more prisons but I'll also lend a hand building them and volunteer may time to be a non-paid corrections employee until more can be hired.
GOD bless America

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)