Recent Comments

City Hall Watch wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “When New Haven went through re…”
cedarhillresident wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Walt thanks and doug too. I kn…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “"Legitimatically".WOW, I inve…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Reevaluation means different…”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rowland Gives Blago Some Advice
    • Rell's Deposit
    • The Fate of Newspapers
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Atlantic Wire Pleads Guilty To Polluting Branford River
    • Hunger Striking Prisoner's Dream of a
      New Trial Won't Come True This Year
    • Falsely Arrested Man Files Suit Over Police Corruption
  • Education
    • Lobbying Season Starts Early At Capitol
    • UConn Hires Alternative Energy Experts
    • Cosby's message: Responsible parenting
      wrapped in hope and empowerment
  • Election 2008
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
    • No Censure, Just A Letter Of Disapproval
    • Dems Expected to Scold Lieberman Today
  • Environment
    • Hartford Landfill Closes
    • Is That Toy Safe?
    • Hartford Marathon Goes Orange and Green
  • General News
    • 35 Cents An Hour = Cleaner Dishes
    • Memories From 2008: A Year In Review
    • We Know We Promised
  • Health Care
    • Quizzed on Health Care
    • State Officials Insist Husky Network Is Adequate
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
    • Jobless Numbers Are Up And The Phone Keeps Ringing
    • Union Members Honor State Veterans
  • Legal
    • Lawmaker Requests Inmate Information
    • Blumenthal May Stop Suing
    • The Framing of Mumia Abu Jamal
  • Local Politics
    • WPCA Urged To Tackle Marshal Fees
    • Who Has The Power To Appoint?
    • Marshals' Sweetheart Deals Targeted
  • Media Matters
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • WTIC Layoffs Have One Sponsor
      Questioning His Support
    • New Blog Emerges In Troubled Times
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • CTNewsJunkie wants your opinions
    • Curious Delivery Made To Press Room
    • Op-Ed: Speaking Out Against A Constitutional Convention
  • State Capitol
    • Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
      & Give Us Choices
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • Majority Still Cryptic About Special Session
      But Finally Decide On a Date
  • Transportation
    • Rell: Scale Back Rail Project
    • TSB To Study Tolls

Realtors Want to Know “How Can a Tax Be Tax Relief?”

by Christine Stuart | May 22, 2008 11:39 PM
Posted to General News

Christine Stuart photo

A dozen realtors called on Democratic leaders Thursday to cancel plans for a special session to extend the real estate conveyance tax.

Legislative leaders plan to reconvene in June to extend a tax that generates about $40 million per year for cities and towns, which didn’t receive as big a boost in state aid as initially anticipated.

Bob Fiorito, former president of the Connecticut Association of Realtors, said “every other contingency has managed to make due with less,” and the municipalities shouldn’t be any different. Ken DelVecchio, president of CAR, said the conveyance tax is a regressive levy because it’s based on the price of the home and not a person’s ability to pay.

Not to mention, it was never meant to be a permanent tax, DelVecchio said. The tax, which is paid by people selling their home, was created in 2003 to fill a budget hole. It was supposed to end after 15 months, but the tax was extended year, after year, until it was finally expected to sunset June 30.

The average homeowner pays about 1 percent of the value of their home at the closing, so for homeowners selling a home valued at $250,000 the tax would be $2,500.

The realtors say the problem is that foreclosures have gone up 40 percent when you compare the market in March 2007 with March 2008. And even homeowners selling their homes at a loss have to pay the tax.

Christine Stuart photo

Nicole Dagata, a realtor for 11 years in Central Connecticut, said she sold a house for a young couple in Middletown and they had to borrow money from their parents to pay the closing fees. She said she also had an elderly New Britain couple, on a fixed income find a buyer for their home, but at the end of the day they owed more money on the house than they could sell it for in this market, so they ended up walking away from it and it went into foreclosure.

When this happens, the bank doesn’t pay the conveyance tax, Fiorito said. And it’s almost impossible to figure out how many homeowners will be selling at a loss since none of the realtors, banks, attorneys, or courts track what are called short sales.

Lawmakers had initially wanted to exempt homeowners selling at a loss, but Senate President Donald Williams, has said he doesn’t think that will be possible because it “may have a significant impact on the revenue,” the conveyance tax raises for cities and towns.

“The conveyance tax is extremely important tax,” Speaker of the House James Amann has said. “The best we can do is give some sort of relief.”

But what DelVecchio can’t understand is “How can a tax be tax relief?” He said “The $40 million collected by municipalities isn’t coming off trees. It’s coming from the pockets of home sellers. Now more than ever, they need a break.”