Recent Comments

ACR wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “>>Spoke to people from Subway …”
christine wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Thanks Martha. I know he's pus…”
Johnny wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Its nice to see that Rell has …”
Martha H. wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Christine, Don't know all of …”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rell Kills Bill
    • Treading Water Is Getting Tougher In Connecticut
    • Looks Like It's Been Off For A While. . .
  • Congress
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • Joe: No Go On 'Public Option'
  • Corporate Watch
    • Banks Committee Begins With Little Fanfare
      AIG Executive Answers Few Questions
    • AIG Executive To Testify Thursday
    • Lawmakers Frustrated By AIG 'Compliance'
  • Courts
    • Senor Pancho's Owner Pleads Guilty
    • 'If You Work Hard You Can Succeed In America'
    • Supreme Court Overturns City on Ricci
  • Education
    • Programs Scaled Back Without Budget In Place
    • A Year Later, Still Waiting For Education Ruling
    • Students Lobby For Opportunity To Sit On School Board
  • Election 2008
    • With Obama, De'Vonna Solemnly Swears
    • Hairdresser Scores Ticket To History
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
  • Election 2010
    • Scully's Departure From Amann Campaign
      Leaves More Questions Than Answers
    • State Elections Watchdog To Retire
    • Q-Poll: Dodd Shows Gains, Simmons Still Strong
  • Environment
    • Developer Aims High As He Waits For
      Rell To Sign Green Tax Credit Bill
    • Dairy Farmers Celebrate Legislative Victory
    • Bill Would Ban Lions, Bears, and Chimps
  • General News
    • Foiled Again! Polka Bill Dies During Legislative Session
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
    • State Won't Charge Cromwell Lawmaker
  • Health Care
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • Paid Sick Days Bill Passes House
    • Nursing Home Strike Canceled
    • Senate Gives Final Passage To Union Deal
  • Legal
    • Blumenthal Sides With Catholic Church
    • Governor Signs 'Madoff' Bill
    • Bill Seeks To Protect Consumers From Scams
  • Local Politics
    • A Garden Grows. Do The Children?
    • Municipal Leaders Request Meeting
      With State Budget Negotiators
    • Marshal Forced To Lower Fees In New Haven
  • Media Matters
    • JRC Boss Hangs Up Hatchet
    • A Sentinel Remembered--& Welcomed
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • OP-ED: SustiNet Awaits Action In The Senate
    • Op-Ed: Smoking Ban Would Cost State
    • OP-ED: Time to Get Tough On Credit Card Companies
  • State Capitol
    • Taking A Break From The Budget
    • Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Transportation
    • New Rail Cars Fail First Test, Officials Not Worried
    • 40 Percent Bus 'Tax' Blasted
    • Debate On Open Containers Stalls In House

Realtors Want to Know “How Can a Tax Be Tax Relief?”

by Christine Stuart | May 22, 2008 11:39 PM
Posted to General News

Christine Stuart photo

A dozen realtors called on Democratic leaders Thursday to cancel plans for a special session to extend the real estate conveyance tax.

Legislative leaders plan to reconvene in June to extend a tax that generates about $40 million per year for cities and towns, which didn’t receive as big a boost in state aid as initially anticipated.

Bob Fiorito, former president of the Connecticut Association of Realtors, said “every other contingency has managed to make due with less,” and the municipalities shouldn’t be any different. Ken DelVecchio, president of CAR, said the conveyance tax is a regressive levy because it’s based on the price of the home and not a person’s ability to pay.

Not to mention, it was never meant to be a permanent tax, DelVecchio said. The tax, which is paid by people selling their home, was created in 2003 to fill a budget hole. It was supposed to end after 15 months, but the tax was extended year, after year, until it was finally expected to sunset June 30.

The average homeowner pays about 1 percent of the value of their home at the closing, so for homeowners selling a home valued at $250,000 the tax would be $2,500.

The realtors say the problem is that foreclosures have gone up 40 percent when you compare the market in March 2007 with March 2008. And even homeowners selling their homes at a loss have to pay the tax.

Christine Stuart photo

Nicole Dagata, a realtor for 11 years in Central Connecticut, said she sold a house for a young couple in Middletown and they had to borrow money from their parents to pay the closing fees. She said she also had an elderly New Britain couple, on a fixed income find a buyer for their home, but at the end of the day they owed more money on the house than they could sell it for in this market, so they ended up walking away from it and it went into foreclosure.

When this happens, the bank doesn’t pay the conveyance tax, Fiorito said. And it’s almost impossible to figure out how many homeowners will be selling at a loss since none of the realtors, banks, attorneys, or courts track what are called short sales.

Lawmakers had initially wanted to exempt homeowners selling at a loss, but Senate President Donald Williams, has said he doesn’t think that will be possible because it “may have a significant impact on the revenue,” the conveyance tax raises for cities and towns.

“The conveyance tax is extremely important tax,” Speaker of the House James Amann has said. “The best we can do is give some sort of relief.”

But what DelVecchio can’t understand is “How can a tax be tax relief?” He said “The $40 million collected by municipalities isn’t coming off trees. It’s coming from the pockets of home sellers. Now more than ever, they need a break.”