Recent Comments

City Hall Watch wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “When New Haven went through re…”
cedarhillresident wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Walt thanks and doug too. I kn…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “"Legitimatically".WOW, I inve…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Reevaluation means different…”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rowland Gives Blago Some Advice
    • Rell's Deposit
    • The Fate of Newspapers
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Atlantic Wire Pleads Guilty To Polluting Branford River
    • Hunger Striking Prisoner's Dream of a
      New Trial Won't Come True This Year
  • Education
    • Lobbying Season Starts Early At Capitol
    • UConn Hires Alternative Energy Experts
    • Cosby's message: Responsible parenting
      wrapped in hope and empowerment
  • Election 2008
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
    • No Censure, Just A Letter Of Disapproval
    • Dems Expected to Scold Lieberman Today
  • Environment
    • Hartford Landfill Closes
    • Is That Toy Safe?
    • Hartford Marathon Goes Orange and Green
  • General News
    • 35 Cents An Hour = Cleaner Dishes
    • Memories From 2008: A Year In Review
    • We Know We Promised
  • Health Care
    • Quizzed on Health Care
    • State Officials Insist Husky Network Is Adequate
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
    • Jobless Numbers Are Up And The Phone Keeps Ringing
    • Union Members Honor State Veterans
  • Legal
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Lawmaker Requests Inmate Information
    • Blumenthal May Stop Suing
  • Local Politics
    • WPCA Urged To Tackle Marshal Fees
    • Who Has The Power To Appoint?
    • Marshals' Sweetheart Deals Targeted
  • Media Matters
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • WTIC Layoffs Have One Sponsor
      Questioning His Support
    • New Blog Emerges In Troubled Times
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • CTNewsJunkie wants your opinions
    • Curious Delivery Made To Press Room
    • Op-Ed: Speaking Out Against A Constitutional Convention
  • State Capitol
    • Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
      & Give Us Choices
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • Majority Still Cryptic About Special Session
      But Finally Decide On a Date
  • Transportation
    • Rell: Scale Back Rail Project
    • TSB To Study Tolls

Rell on Rowland and the Budget

by Christine Stuart | June 18, 2007 3:07 PM
Posted to General News

Christine Stuart photo
At a bill signing ceremony Monday, Gov. M. Jodi Rell decided not to fire back at former governor John G. Rowland who told the Washington Post in a story that ran Sunday, “She threw me under the bus when it got rough.”

Instead, Rell who served as Rowland’s lieutenant governor for 10 years, took the high road. She said she understands her predecessor’s “anger and frustration,” but “I will always be grateful for the opportunity he gave me.”

“I wish him and his family the very best,” Rell said before rushing off to the noon budget discussions being held at the Governor’s mansion.

Click here to read the profile of Rowland in the Washington Post or continue reading to hear Rell’s response to the latest in budget negotiations.

In the recent weeks following the end of the legislative session, Rell has stayed on message when asked by reporters how budget negotiations are going.

“It feels like I’ve said this a hundred thousand times,” Rell said before answering questions about why she hasn’t taken part yet in the discussions. She said Budget Secretary Robert Genuario is the one who negotiates the budget on my behalf until a deal is close.

“We’re not there yet,” Rell said. She said at the meeting Monday she expects to go back over the ground rules for negotiations.

She said the major stumbling block still is that the Democrats spending proposal is too high. Rell still refuses to believe there is an estimated $250 million hole in her own spending proposal, if the state doesn’t increase taxes as the Republicans have proposed.

Patrick Scully, director of communications for the Senate Democrats, sent out an email Monday highlighting portions of Rell’s budget address from February which seems to answer the Republican’s question about why a no tax increase budget doesn’t work.

“Some may ask: Why is it that we need tax increases next fiscal year when the state has a 500 million dollar budget surplus this year?

Because the cost of running state government next year - without any new programs or services - will increase by over 800 million dollars just to fund inflation, debt service, health care for active and retired state employees, energy costs to heat and light state buildings, gasoline for state police vehicles, arbitrated contract awards for state employees and more. $800 million before any new investments are made.

And I want to make new investments - investments for the generations - especially in education, in property tax relief, in health care, and in energy relief.”

So the question for Rell really becomes what investments is she willing to give up to forego a tax increase?

Comments (1)

Posted by: GreatGooglyMoogly | June 18, 2007 5:36 PM

Good god they're not even close yet... let's get it done folks! Maybe Bob Barker could come out of retirement and help them figure out the price of doing the state's business... We could line up Rell, Williams, Looney, Amann and the rest down front...

"AAANNND the actual retail price of running the state of Connecticut IS ...."


Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)