Recent Comments

ACR wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “>>Spoke to people from Subway …”
christine wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Thanks Martha. I know he's pus…”
Johnny wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Its nice to see that Rell has …”
Martha H. wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Christine, Don't know all of …”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rell Kills Bill
    • Treading Water Is Getting Tougher In Connecticut
    • Looks Like It's Been Off For A While. . .
  • Congress
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • Joe: No Go On 'Public Option'
  • Corporate Watch
    • Banks Committee Begins With Little Fanfare
      AIG Executive Answers Few Questions
    • AIG Executive To Testify Thursday
    • Lawmakers Frustrated By AIG 'Compliance'
  • Courts
    • Senor Pancho's Owner Pleads Guilty
    • 'If You Work Hard You Can Succeed In America'
    • Supreme Court Overturns City on Ricci
  • Education
    • Programs Scaled Back Without Budget In Place
    • A Year Later, Still Waiting For Education Ruling
    • Students Lobby For Opportunity To Sit On School Board
  • Election 2008
    • With Obama, De'Vonna Solemnly Swears
    • Hairdresser Scores Ticket To History
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
  • Election 2010
    • Scully's Departure From Amann Campaign
      Leaves More Questions Than Answers
    • State Elections Watchdog To Retire
    • Q-Poll: Dodd Shows Gains, Simmons Still Strong
  • Environment
    • Developer Aims High As He Waits For
      Rell To Sign Green Tax Credit Bill
    • Dairy Farmers Celebrate Legislative Victory
    • Bill Would Ban Lions, Bears, and Chimps
  • General News
    • Foiled Again! Polka Bill Dies During Legislative Session
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
    • State Won't Charge Cromwell Lawmaker
  • Health Care
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • Paid Sick Days Bill Passes House
    • Nursing Home Strike Canceled
    • Senate Gives Final Passage To Union Deal
  • Legal
    • Blumenthal Sides With Catholic Church
    • Governor Signs 'Madoff' Bill
    • Bill Seeks To Protect Consumers From Scams
  • Local Politics
    • A Garden Grows. Do The Children?
    • Municipal Leaders Request Meeting
      With State Budget Negotiators
    • Marshal Forced To Lower Fees In New Haven
  • Media Matters
    • JRC Boss Hangs Up Hatchet
    • A Sentinel Remembered--& Welcomed
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • OP-ED: SustiNet Awaits Action In The Senate
    • Op-Ed: Smoking Ban Would Cost State
    • OP-ED: Time to Get Tough On Credit Card Companies
  • State Capitol
    • Taking A Break From The Budget
    • Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Transportation
    • New Rail Cars Fail First Test, Officials Not Worried
    • 40 Percent Bus 'Tax' Blasted
    • Debate On Open Containers Stalls In House

CT Congressmen on Medicare

by Christine Stuart | April 3, 2007 7:44 PM
Posted to Health Care

Christine Stuart photo
Connecticut Congressmen Joe Courtney, D-2, and Chris Murphy, D-5, announced their intention Tuesday to introduce legislation that improves the Medicare Part D drug program authored by former Congresswoman Nancy Johnson.

Instead of making Medicare Part D work for the drug and insurance industry, the two Congressmen said they are proposing a comprehensive plan aimed at consumers.

How?

Murphy said their plan would allow Medicare to offer its own drug formulary plan, which will create competition with the 51 private plans currently offered in Connecticut by the program. He said by buying in bulk the government will be able to offer a better deal.

Courtney said their plan would also eliminate the late-enrollment penalties and asset test. In addition it will provide in-person hearings for those seeking to appeal a Medicare decision.

Judith Stein, executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc., said at the moment the appeals are heard via video-conference, usually from a business like a Kinko’s. She said it’s not the same as an “actual in-person hearing.”

She said each plan sets its own formulary, so no one size fits all, which makes Medicare Part D benefits difficult to explain to a room of seniors. “Now we have to sit down with each person to help them make the proper choice,” she said.

This legislation responds to the “real needs of real people,” Stein said.

Click here for the press release.

Does Their Political Future Hinge on This Bill?

Murphy and Courtney seemed to dismiss the notion that if this Medicare Part D reform doesn’t pass they won’t be re-elected.

The two campaigned heavily on the issue for at least two years. In addition both had been chairman of the state legislature’s Public Health Committee and have a good understanding of the problems created by the drug program. Courtney helped create the state wrap-around program for people in the state who fall into the Medicare drug coverage gap.

“I look at it as our responsibility to address the needs of our constituents,” Murphy said. “This to me isn’t about politics. It’s about doing the right thing.”

Courtney agreed. He said he doesn’t analyze this in terms of his political survival. He said this is one of the most important issues the new Democratic Congress will address.

Comments (1)

Posted by: Walt | April 6, 2007 8:46 AM

Hope these politicians do not mess up Plan D.

They and other Dems campaigned against this Plan vociferously, but it works great for us.

Their griping was the primary cause that so many seniors were not registered in PlanD's first year.

Our prescription costs have dropped 60 to 90% since Plan D went into effect

Even costs for generics thru the V.A.($8 per month and soon to rise again) have been cut to $4 per month for me thru our Oxford Plan D, which costs us nothing extra.

I'm not an expert on Medicare, but know enough as as a Plan participant to realize these two are not working to help me, just themselves.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)