Recent Comments

City Hall Watch wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “When New Haven went through re…”
cedarhillresident wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Walt thanks and doug too. I kn…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “"Legitimatically".WOW, I inve…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Reevaluation means different…”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rowland Gives Blago Some Advice
    • Rell's Deposit
    • The Fate of Newspapers
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Atlantic Wire Pleads Guilty To Polluting Branford River
    • Hunger Striking Prisoner's Dream of a
      New Trial Won't Come True This Year
    • Falsely Arrested Man Files Suit Over Police Corruption
  • Education
    • Lobbying Season Starts Early At Capitol
    • UConn Hires Alternative Energy Experts
    • Cosby's message: Responsible parenting
      wrapped in hope and empowerment
  • Election 2008
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
    • No Censure, Just A Letter Of Disapproval
    • Dems Expected to Scold Lieberman Today
  • Environment
    • Hartford Landfill Closes
    • Is That Toy Safe?
    • Hartford Marathon Goes Orange and Green
  • General News
    • 35 Cents An Hour = Cleaner Dishes
    • Memories From 2008: A Year In Review
    • We Know We Promised
  • Health Care
    • Quizzed on Health Care
    • State Officials Insist Husky Network Is Adequate
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
    • Jobless Numbers Are Up And The Phone Keeps Ringing
    • Union Members Honor State Veterans
  • Legal
    • Lawmaker Requests Inmate Information
    • Blumenthal May Stop Suing
    • The Framing of Mumia Abu Jamal
  • Local Politics
    • WPCA Urged To Tackle Marshal Fees
    • Who Has The Power To Appoint?
    • Marshals' Sweetheart Deals Targeted
  • Media Matters
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • WTIC Layoffs Have One Sponsor
      Questioning His Support
    • New Blog Emerges In Troubled Times
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • CTNewsJunkie wants your opinions
    • Curious Delivery Made To Press Room
    • Op-Ed: Speaking Out Against A Constitutional Convention
  • State Capitol
    • Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
      & Give Us Choices
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • Majority Still Cryptic About Special Session
      But Finally Decide On a Date
  • Transportation
    • Rell: Scale Back Rail Project
    • TSB To Study Tolls

Mental Health Parity “Non-negotiable” Says Lawmaker

by Christine Stuart | April 10, 2008 1:24 PM
Posted to Health Care | State Capitol

Christine Stuart photo

(updated 7:22 p.m.) Mental health advocates and a handful of lawmakers want Gov. M. Jodi Rell to include mental health parity in her Charter Oak Health Plan, which she is advertising as “affordable coverage for uninsured adults of all incomes.”

Bids on the Charter Oak Health Plan are expected to be announced later this week or early next week.

Senator Jonathan Harris, D-West Hartford, said this morning that there’s always time to have the HMO’s amend their bids to include coverage of mental illness, which in his opinion is “non-negotiable.”

Harris went on to explain that the concerns about cost should not be an issue. While there is no cost estimate yet for legislation that asks for mental health parity to be included in the governor’s plan, he said, the cost depending on how many people participate is generally negligible.

Dr. Virginia Shiller of the Connecticut Psychological Association said if mental health parity is not included she fears taxpayers will have to pay for it in other ways—children with behavior problems will need special school services, adults may miss work, have failed marriages, or be unable to parent their children sending them into foster care.

“Mental illness does not go away because it isn’t treated,” Shiller said.

Susan Oriola of Danielson said saying people with mental illness do not deserve the same treatment as those with medical problems, is “like the doctor telling the patient that his/her liver can be fixed, but not his/her brain.”

Oriola said she’s seen first hand what happens to those without good health insurance. She said when she was in treatment she saw people leave the hospital after a half-day session, and come back the next day stating “they picked up a drink or a drug to get them through the rest of the previous day.” She said she was lucky her insurance covered a full day of treatment.

Since 1999, the state of Connecticut has required all commercial insurance providers to include mental health parity in their health insurance plans.

Comments (1)

Posted by: Kristina Zallinger | April 25, 2008 5:24 PM

Mental Health Parity is a must in regard to the Charter Oak Plan! I have a Mental Illness myself and find even questioning coverage for those who suffer from it is very degrading and sad. It seems that treatment for an ailment "above the shoulders" is not acceptable. People with a Mental Illness need medications which help to correct the chemical imbalances in the brain. This is imperative! Mental Illness IS a physical illness. DON'T leave us out in the cold! One out of five people have a Mental Illness. This figure does not exclude residents of Connecticut. There may be somewhat of a riot among the many thousands who are left out of the Governor's Charter Oak Plan!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)