Recent Comments

ACR wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “>>Spoke to people from Subway …”
christine wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Thanks Martha. I know he's pus…”
Johnny wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Its nice to see that Rell has …”
Martha H. wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Christine, Don't know all of …”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rell Kills Bill
    • Treading Water Is Getting Tougher In Connecticut
    • Looks Like It's Been Off For A While. . .
  • Congress
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • Joe: No Go On 'Public Option'
  • Corporate Watch
    • Banks Committee Begins With Little Fanfare
      AIG Executive Answers Few Questions
    • AIG Executive To Testify Thursday
    • Lawmakers Frustrated By AIG 'Compliance'
  • Courts
    • Senor Pancho's Owner Pleads Guilty
    • 'If You Work Hard You Can Succeed In America'
    • Supreme Court Overturns City on Ricci
  • Education
    • Programs Scaled Back Without Budget In Place
    • A Year Later, Still Waiting For Education Ruling
    • Students Lobby For Opportunity To Sit On School Board
  • Election 2008
    • With Obama, De'Vonna Solemnly Swears
    • Hairdresser Scores Ticket To History
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
  • Election 2010
    • Scully's Departure From Amann Campaign
      Leaves More Questions Than Answers
    • State Elections Watchdog To Retire
    • Q-Poll: Dodd Shows Gains, Simmons Still Strong
  • Environment
    • Developer Aims High As He Waits For
      Rell To Sign Green Tax Credit Bill
    • Dairy Farmers Celebrate Legislative Victory
    • Bill Would Ban Lions, Bears, and Chimps
  • General News
    • Foiled Again! Polka Bill Dies During Legislative Session
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
    • State Won't Charge Cromwell Lawmaker
  • Health Care
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • Paid Sick Days Bill Passes House
    • Nursing Home Strike Canceled
    • Senate Gives Final Passage To Union Deal
  • Legal
    • Blumenthal Sides With Catholic Church
    • Governor Signs 'Madoff' Bill
    • Bill Seeks To Protect Consumers From Scams
  • Local Politics
    • A Garden Grows. Do The Children?
    • Municipal Leaders Request Meeting
      With State Budget Negotiators
    • Marshal Forced To Lower Fees In New Haven
  • Media Matters
    • JRC Boss Hangs Up Hatchet
    • A Sentinel Remembered--& Welcomed
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • OP-ED: SustiNet Awaits Action In The Senate
    • Op-Ed: Smoking Ban Would Cost State
    • OP-ED: Time to Get Tough On Credit Card Companies
  • State Capitol
    • Taking A Break From The Budget
    • Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Transportation
    • New Rail Cars Fail First Test, Officials Not Worried
    • 40 Percent Bus 'Tax' Blasted
    • Debate On Open Containers Stalls In House

Clergy for Marriage Equality

by Christine Stuart | April 19, 2007 4:43 PM
Posted to State Capitol

Christine Stuart photo
Connecticut Clergy for Marriage Equality, a group with nearly 200 members, gathered Thursday to ask lawmakers and the governor to pass a bill that would change the name of civil unions to marriage for same-sex couples.

“We do not believe state marriage statutes ought to perpetuate discrimination against same gender loving people,” Rev. Josh Pawelek (pictured) said.

“When any two people find each other and choose to spend their lives together, the union should not only be recognized, but celebrated,” Rabbi Kim Blumenthal said.

Blumenthal told the story of Hillel, one of the earliest rabbis. She said Hillel was taunted by a man who asked the leader to teach him the Torah while standing on one foot. She said Hillel lifted one foot and said, “‘What is hateful to you, do not to your neighbor’: that is the whole Torah, while the rest is the commentary.”

She said clinging to Hillel’s statement, “we get the directive that treating others as we would want to be treated is the basis for religious traditions. We must evaluate all of our actions in accordance with this command.”

While the bill may pass the legislature, Gov. M. Jodi Rell has said she would veto it, even though approved the legislation that created civil unions. Pawelek said the clergy would request a meeting with her and try to change her mind. He asked Rell to consider “going down in history as the first governor in the United States to say yes to marriage justice for gay and lesbian families.”

Comments (3)

Posted by: A.P. | April 20, 2007 9:11 AM

This is too ridiculous to believe. Why didn't Hillel advocate gay marriage? Because he knew it was an abomination before God and the penalty was death. This secular humanism is just going too far. You can't change the design of the universe to suit your personal preferences. It has never been man and man or woman and woman. That's not how things were designed. If that were the case there would be no people on the earth. It is what it is. You can't change that!
SORRY!

Posted by: dafeder | April 20, 2007 11:57 AM

At what point are current marriage laws impinging on the free practice of religion, as expressed by these ministers and rabbis? Isn't fighting for the ubiquitous expression of religion what the Bush Justice Department is all about? (Or is it really just about ceding the public sphere to the Bushies' religion of choice?)

So here's the solution: make all marriage "civil union" from the perspective of the state. Allow any two people to take part, according to their individual civil rights -- no minors, no pets, no groups, but no gender assumptions. Civil rights are gender-blind. Leave the religious and moral valuation to the religious and moral leaders. They'll differ, of course, but that's actually freedom of religion. Remember when freedom of _any_ religion was a _good_ thing?

Posted by: Kerri | April 20, 2007 2:09 PM

Glad to see Rev. Josh representing. I think it's noble that he has taken an open stand as a clergyman on such an issue that has been presented as the "religious versus the damned."

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)