Recent Comments

cedarhillresident wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Walt thanks and doug too. I kn…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “"Legitimatically".WOW, I inve…”
Walt wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Reevaluation means different…”
Jon Searles wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “There is no way Bridgeport DOE…”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rowland Gives Blago Some Advice
    • Rell's Deposit
    • The Fate of Newspapers
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Atlantic Wire Pleads Guilty To Polluting Branford River
    • Hunger Striking Prisoner's Dream of a
      New Trial Won't Come True This Year
    • Falsely Arrested Man Files Suit Over Police Corruption
  • Education
    • Lobbying Season Starts Early At Capitol
    • UConn Hires Alternative Energy Experts
    • Cosby's message: Responsible parenting
      wrapped in hope and empowerment
  • Election 2008
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
    • No Censure, Just A Letter Of Disapproval
    • Dems Expected to Scold Lieberman Today
  • Environment
    • Hartford Landfill Closes
    • Is That Toy Safe?
    • Hartford Marathon Goes Orange and Green
  • General News
    • 35 Cents An Hour = Cleaner Dishes
    • Memories From 2008: A Year In Review
    • We Know We Promised
  • Health Care
    • Quizzed on Health Care
    • State Officials Insist Husky Network Is Adequate
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
    • Jobless Numbers Are Up And The Phone Keeps Ringing
    • Union Members Honor State Veterans
  • Legal
    • Lawmaker Requests Inmate Information
    • Blumenthal May Stop Suing
    • The Framing of Mumia Abu Jamal
  • Local Politics
    • WPCA Urged To Tackle Marshal Fees
    • Who Has The Power To Appoint?
    • Marshals' Sweetheart Deals Targeted
  • Media Matters
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • WTIC Layoffs Have One Sponsor
      Questioning His Support
    • New Blog Emerges In Troubled Times
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • CTNewsJunkie wants your opinions
    • Curious Delivery Made To Press Room
    • Op-Ed: Speaking Out Against A Constitutional Convention
  • State Capitol
    • Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
      & Give Us Choices
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • Majority Still Cryptic About Special Session
      But Finally Decide On a Date
  • Transportation
    • Rell: Scale Back Rail Project
    • TSB To Study Tolls

Dems Unlikely to Approve GOP Telecommuting Policy

by Christine Stuart | July 15, 2008 5:13 PM
Posted to State Capitol

Christine Stuart photo

Lisa Roy, a legislative assistant to Republican David Labriola of Naugatuck, said that if she had the option to telecommute instead of driving to Hartford just one day a week, it would have a real impact on her family budget.

Roy, who telecommuted to the press conference at the state Capitol from her home office Tuesday in Columbia, said she can work from home “with much greater focus, fewer distractions, and without the stresses that my commute into Hartford from Columbia normally puts on my work hours … and my state of mind.”

House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero said the state has a program that helps private employers implement telecommuting policies, and that the Republican Party wants to lead by example, save taxpayers money, and reduce pollution by adopting a telecommuting policy for its 44 legislative employees.

In order to make that dream a reality for employees like Roy, Cafero said he needs the blessing of Democratic leadership.

However, Democratic leaders don’t seem to be on board with the telecommuting policy the Republicans have submitted, and it seems doubtful the majority party will sign off on the plan.

“We always knew the Republicans were phoning it in, now they want to make it official policy,” Derek Slap, spokesman for Senate President Donald Williams, said Tuesday.

“The reality is that the GOP plan would not save taxpayers any money and would not ease congestion. In fact, the only people the plan would help would be Republican caucus staff members. In these difficult times Senator Williams feels it’s more important and appropriate for elected leaders to focus on helping constituents - not their own staff members,” Slap said.

“It’s a concept worth looking at, but it is critical that no government service is compromised,” added Larry Perosino, spokesman for Speaker of the House James Amann. “Constituent service is paramount at the Legislature, and that may not be an efficient way to meet our responsibility.

“Sounds like there isn’t much going on in the minority offices these days,” he added.

Where does the governor stand?

Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell “is certainly happy to look at anything that makes state government more efficient,” however, “she has concerns about expanding telecommuting and work-from-home options from a practical standpoint,” Rich Harris, the governor’s spokesman, said Tuesday.

He said a majority of state employees give direct services to the public and are needed in their offices or in the field five days a week. “Unlike the federal government, the state has few back office jobs,” Harris said.

Of the estimated 60,000 state employees, Cafero said 140 have telecommute contracts with the state through the end of 2007. He said he understands a telecommuting policy won’t work for all state agencies and employees, but by getting just 10 percent of state employees to telecommute one day a week, it would take nearly 5,000 cars off the road each day.

Cafero said that Arizona state workers have converted 181,000 hours of commuting time into productive working hours and reduced air pollution by 175,000 pounds.

According to Connecticut’s own Web site, Telecommute Connecticut!, telecommuters save an estimated $1,200 per year on fuel costs.

Cafero said he also wants to explore a four day work week for state employees. He said in the House Republican caucus, senior staff members would stagger their telecommuting days to guarantee continuity of constituent services.

The Courant reported Monday that seven municipalities have adopted the four day work week and at least seven other towns are considering similar policies.

Click here to watch the press conference on the CT House Rules blog.

Comments (6)

Posted by: bean | July 15, 2008 9:05 PM

How convenient, Cafero wants his state paid partisan staff members to "work from home" during an election year for the next few months. *wink, wink*

It wouldn't surprise me if he plans on ending this "telecommuting" program the first Wednesday in November.

I bet they have good telephone and internet connections at the GOP Campaign headquarters where his staff members can you know, "work from home."

Posted by: CTcentrist | July 15, 2008 9:11 PM

This is ridiculous on the part of the Democrats. Do they think high gas prices and congested highways are a joke? Apparantly they do. According to the story, this is only a pilot program. If it doesn't work, no harm. Slap's comments especially are the height of arrogance.

Posted by: Headless Horseman | July 16, 2008 8:37 AM

Let me see... Democrats are doing nothing while the gas tax continues to increase, doing nothing about the deficit passing a "Do Nothing" budget, did next to nothing on criminal justice reform, and nothing to help job growth in this state. How is everyone enjoying the Democrats' master plan to relieve traffic congestion, encourage energy conservation and reduce fuel costs. Everyone enjoying it? That's because all they have done is TALK about the issue, but they haven't done anything. they are indifferent, incompetent and ineffective. If someone said hey are the ones "phoning it in" even that would give too much credit to them for their lack of effort.

Posted by: lothar | July 16, 2008 9:19 AM

Yeah those are some really disingenuous -- and frankly stupid -- comments from the Democrats' paid spokesmen. Very partisan. Foolishly and unnecessarily so. The Republicans should just tell their staff to work from home anyway.

If anyone's keeping score on good ideas floated since January, I think it's like 10-0 in favor of the Republicans in CT. To the state's credit, I'm amazed at the disconnect between our state Republicans and the national Republican leadership.

Posted by: urban dweller | July 16, 2008 9:55 AM

Here's a thought: live within walking or biking distance of where you work. Those of us who do (yes, we do exist) don't need to rely on the good will of the taxpayers or the possibility that we won't do our job as well as we otherwise would to both save on fuel costs and show up to work.

Here's another thought: Republican legislators should focus harder about investing in public transit and helping all of us out than on the limited impact of helping out their staff members.

Posted by: Joe | July 16, 2008 12:52 PM

Democrats should stop taking cheap and petty potshots at the Republicans. Is that really necessary?

And BOTH PARTIES should do something about drastically changing our transportation planning and budget priorities. There's a lot of talk about transportation alternatives and choice, but no political will to affect the paradigm shift necessary to transform our state's transportation policy and infrastructure.

Our elected officials are not doing anything real in this realm. It's really quite an embarrassment.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)