Recent Comments

ACR wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “>>Spoke to people from Subway …”
christine wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Thanks Martha. I know he's pus…”
Johnny wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Its nice to see that Rell has …”
Martha H. wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Christine, Don't know all of …”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rell Kills Bill
    • Treading Water Is Getting Tougher In Connecticut
    • Looks Like It's Been Off For A While. . .
  • Congress
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • Joe: No Go On 'Public Option'
  • Corporate Watch
    • Banks Committee Begins With Little Fanfare
      AIG Executive Answers Few Questions
    • AIG Executive To Testify Thursday
    • Lawmakers Frustrated By AIG 'Compliance'
  • Courts
    • Senor Pancho's Owner Pleads Guilty
    • 'If You Work Hard You Can Succeed In America'
    • Supreme Court Overturns City on Ricci
  • Education
    • Programs Scaled Back Without Budget In Place
    • A Year Later, Still Waiting For Education Ruling
    • Students Lobby For Opportunity To Sit On School Board
  • Election 2008
    • With Obama, De'Vonna Solemnly Swears
    • Hairdresser Scores Ticket To History
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
  • Election 2010
    • Scully's Departure From Amann Campaign
      Leaves More Questions Than Answers
    • State Elections Watchdog To Retire
    • Q-Poll: Dodd Shows Gains, Simmons Still Strong
  • Environment
    • Developer Aims High As He Waits For
      Rell To Sign Green Tax Credit Bill
    • Dairy Farmers Celebrate Legislative Victory
    • Bill Would Ban Lions, Bears, and Chimps
  • General News
    • Foiled Again! Polka Bill Dies During Legislative Session
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
    • State Won't Charge Cromwell Lawmaker
  • Health Care
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • Paid Sick Days Bill Passes House
    • Nursing Home Strike Canceled
    • Senate Gives Final Passage To Union Deal
  • Legal
    • Blumenthal Sides With Catholic Church
    • Governor Signs 'Madoff' Bill
    • Bill Seeks To Protect Consumers From Scams
  • Local Politics
    • A Garden Grows. Do The Children?
    • Municipal Leaders Request Meeting
      With State Budget Negotiators
    • Marshal Forced To Lower Fees In New Haven
  • Media Matters
    • JRC Boss Hangs Up Hatchet
    • A Sentinel Remembered--& Welcomed
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • OP-ED: SustiNet Awaits Action In The Senate
    • Op-Ed: Smoking Ban Would Cost State
    • OP-ED: Time to Get Tough On Credit Card Companies
  • State Capitol
    • Taking A Break From The Budget
    • Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Transportation
    • New Rail Cars Fail First Test, Officials Not Worried
    • 40 Percent Bus 'Tax' Blasted
    • Debate On Open Containers Stalls In House

Ethics and Pension Revocation Debate Continues

by Christine Stuart | April 14, 2008 6:39 PM
Posted to State Capitol

House and Senate Republicans held a press conference Monday to talk about what kind of pension revocation they would support in an ethics reform package.

Last week Senate Democrats thought they had worked out a deal with Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell, however, they neglected to get the Republicans on board with new language that called for a judge to reduce the pension of a corrupt public official, instead of revoking it. Senate Democrats had argued Rell’s attorneys said the revocation language would not hold up in court under the federal Employees Retirement Investment and Security Act.

Click the play arrow to watch the Republicans comment on how they’re attorney’s concluded it would hold up in court under ERISA.

Rep. Chris Caruso, D-Bridgeport, who is in favor of taking away the pensions of officials convicted up to 10 years ago, said he believes in pension revocation and not the “watered down” version the Senate Democrats tried to pass last week. “If you allow plea bargaining, which I know the Senate Democrat version does, if you allow plea bargaining with a pension, then it’s not revoking the pension,” Caruso said.

He said if you allow the pension to be used to pay fines, “you’re using taxpayers money to pay for taxpayers money that was stolen.”

Click the play arrow to watch Rep. Caruso talk about how the two different versions would work.

In response to the criticism of its compromise with Rell, Sen. President Donald Williams sent out this statement Monday evening: “Last week Senate Republicans, relying on a technicality, refused to even allow a debate, or final action, on the ethics bill supported by Gov. Rell, Attorney General Blumenthal, and Senate Democrats.”

“Now Republican lawmakers are saying they want reform - and that is good to hear. The real test though, is not what they say on a Monday but what they do on a Wednesday,” Williams said in an emailed statement. “We want to pass a bill that will strengthen public trust in government and I hope our Republican and Democratic friends will roll up their sleeves and make a pledge to get this done.”

Comments (1)

Posted by: Headless Horseman | April 15, 2008 6:42 AM

Let us not forget to note that Speaker Amann played a significant role in messing up the ethics package last week by trying to keep his chief of staff and gubernatorial campaign treasurer capable of soliciting funds on his behalf.
http://www.journalinquirer.com/articles/2008/04/14/connecticut/doc4803672792d4d316364057.txt

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)