Recent Comments

Jon Searles wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “There is no way Bridgeport DOE…”
Doug wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Hi cedar... delaying the reval…”
cedarhillresident wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “hmmm I support all of this. Gl…”
Christine wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “Check out The Real Hartford's …”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rowland Gives Blago Some Advice
    • Rell's Deposit
    • The Fate of Newspapers
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Atlantic Wire Pleads Guilty To Polluting Branford River
    • Hunger Striking Prisoner's Dream of a
      New Trial Won't Come True This Year
    • Falsely Arrested Man Files Suit Over Police Corruption
  • Education
    • Lobbying Season Starts Early At Capitol
    • UConn Hires Alternative Energy Experts
    • Cosby's message: Responsible parenting
      wrapped in hope and empowerment
  • Election 2008
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
    • No Censure, Just A Letter Of Disapproval
    • Dems Expected to Scold Lieberman Today
  • Environment
    • Hartford Landfill Closes
    • Is That Toy Safe?
    • Hartford Marathon Goes Orange and Green
  • General News
    • 35 Cents An Hour = Cleaner Dishes
    • Memories From 2008: A Year In Review
    • We Know We Promised
  • Health Care
    • Quizzed on Health Care
    • State Officials Insist Husky Network Is Adequate
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
    • Jobless Numbers Are Up And The Phone Keeps Ringing
    • Union Members Honor State Veterans
  • Legal
    • Lawmaker Requests Inmate Information
    • Blumenthal May Stop Suing
    • The Framing of Mumia Abu Jamal
  • Local Politics
    • WPCA Urged To Tackle Marshal Fees
    • Who Has The Power To Appoint?
    • Marshals' Sweetheart Deals Targeted
  • Media Matters
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • WTIC Layoffs Have One Sponsor
      Questioning His Support
    • New Blog Emerges In Troubled Times
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • CTNewsJunkie wants your opinions
    • Curious Delivery Made To Press Room
    • Op-Ed: Speaking Out Against A Constitutional Convention
  • State Capitol
    • Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
      & Give Us Choices
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • Majority Still Cryptic About Special Session
      But Finally Decide On a Date
  • Transportation
    • Rell: Scale Back Rail Project
    • TSB To Study Tolls

GAE Passes Krayeske Bill

by Christine Stuart | March 26, 2007 10:38 PM
Posted to State Capitol

The General Administration and Elections Committee passed a bill Monday that would give a legislative panel supervision over law enforcement lists like the one which prompted Ken Krayeske’s arrest during the governor’s inaugural parade.

The bill 6249 was passed 9 to 4 and now heads to the Judiciary Committee for approval.

Rep. John Hetherington, R-New Canaan, one of the four Republicans who voted against the bill, said the legislation is a “disproportionate” response to the arrest. He said the charges against Krayeske were dropped and he now has the right to pursue a civil lawsuit against those involved in the arrest. Using this logic, Hetherington concluded the system is already set up with checks and balanced.

GAE Co-Chairman, Rep. Christopher Caruso, D-Bridgeport, said if a group of legislators hadn’t immediately spoken out on this issue it may have had an entirely different outcome. He advocated the need for legislative oversight.

Comments (1)

Posted by: Steven G. Erickson | March 27, 2007 6:46 PM

Ken has opened up the gates.

For police to feel that comfortable passing out memos of who to arrest and then the subject is arrested on sight, it says they have had a lot of practice at being this arrogant and Unconstitutional, probably for decades.

How many prison cells are filled with those that would not be if they were not on the secret Connecticut State Police "Enemies List"?

What about them?

Should legislation be passed so they get justice and relief?

What about their families and children?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)