Recent Comments

ACR wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “>>Spoke to people from Subway …”
christine wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Thanks Martha. I know he's pus…”
Johnny wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Its nice to see that Rell has …”
Martha H. wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Christine, Don't know all of …”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rell Kills Bill
    • Treading Water Is Getting Tougher In Connecticut
    • Looks Like It's Been Off For A While. . .
  • Congress
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • Joe: No Go On 'Public Option'
  • Corporate Watch
    • Banks Committee Begins With Little Fanfare
      AIG Executive Answers Few Questions
    • AIG Executive To Testify Thursday
    • Lawmakers Frustrated By AIG 'Compliance'
  • Courts
    • Senor Pancho's Owner Pleads Guilty
    • 'If You Work Hard You Can Succeed In America'
    • Supreme Court Overturns City on Ricci
  • Education
    • Programs Scaled Back Without Budget In Place
    • A Year Later, Still Waiting For Education Ruling
    • Students Lobby For Opportunity To Sit On School Board
  • Election 2008
    • With Obama, De'Vonna Solemnly Swears
    • Hairdresser Scores Ticket To History
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
  • Election 2010
    • Scully's Departure From Amann Campaign
      Leaves More Questions Than Answers
    • State Elections Watchdog To Retire
    • Q-Poll: Dodd Shows Gains, Simmons Still Strong
  • Environment
    • Developer Aims High As He Waits For
      Rell To Sign Green Tax Credit Bill
    • Dairy Farmers Celebrate Legislative Victory
    • Bill Would Ban Lions, Bears, and Chimps
  • General News
    • Foiled Again! Polka Bill Dies During Legislative Session
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
    • State Won't Charge Cromwell Lawmaker
  • Health Care
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • Paid Sick Days Bill Passes House
    • Nursing Home Strike Canceled
    • Senate Gives Final Passage To Union Deal
  • Legal
    • Blumenthal Sides With Catholic Church
    • Governor Signs 'Madoff' Bill
    • Bill Seeks To Protect Consumers From Scams
  • Local Politics
    • A Garden Grows. Do The Children?
    • Municipal Leaders Request Meeting
      With State Budget Negotiators
    • Marshal Forced To Lower Fees In New Haven
  • Media Matters
    • JRC Boss Hangs Up Hatchet
    • A Sentinel Remembered--& Welcomed
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • OP-ED: SustiNet Awaits Action In The Senate
    • Op-Ed: Smoking Ban Would Cost State
    • OP-ED: Time to Get Tough On Credit Card Companies
  • State Capitol
    • Taking A Break From The Budget
    • Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Transportation
    • New Rail Cars Fail First Test, Officials Not Worried
    • 40 Percent Bus 'Tax' Blasted
    • Debate On Open Containers Stalls In House

Lawlor Clears Up DeLuca Confusion

by Christine Stuart | June 12, 2007 1:17 PM
Posted to State Capitol

Christine Stuart photo
Judiciary Committee Co-Chairman Rep. Michael Lawlor, D-East Haven, tried to clarify the legislature’s ability to ouster Senate Minority Leader Louis DeLuca, R-Woodbury, should it wish to address the issue.

The Connecticut Constitution does not allow for the impeachment of members of the General Assembly, Lawlor said Monday in response to a number of news reports and editorials that have recently called for or speculated about the possible impeachment of a senator.

Lawlor explained that under the Connecticut Constitution, only “the governor, and all other executive and judicial officers” can be impeached.

However, he said, Article III, Section 13 of the state constitution provides that a legislator can be expelled or punished by a two-thirds vote of the chamber in which that legislator is a member.

“The impeachment an officer from the executive or judicial branch would require a hearing in the House of Representatives followed by a majority vote in the House. If the House votes to impeach, then there would then be a full trial in the Senate. Following the trial, removal from office would then require a two-thirds vote by the Senate,” he said.

“However, in the case of a legislator, only the body in which that legislator resides can punish or expel them. Either case would require a two-thirds vote by that chamber alone,” Lawlor said.

According to the non-partisan Office of Legislative Research, while no legislator has ever been expelled, the only legislator to be punished was former State Representative Russell Reynolds, who was censured and reprimanded by the House in 1980 after making a racist remark in a written press questionnaire. A resolution of expulsion had been considered in that case, but was never acted upon.

“Under our state constitution, a member of the House of Representatives can only be expelled or punished by the House, and a member of the Senate can only be expelled or punished by the Senate,” Lawlor said. “These procedures are very similar to the ones used in Congress under Article 1, Section 5 of the United States Constitution.”

Comments (1)

Posted by: Don Corn Leone | June 13, 2007 8:46 AM

Ok, so make him an offer he can't refuse. Get rid of him, and make it look silly.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)