Recent Comments

Tim Follert wrote:
Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
: “A crime is a crime no matter t…”
Doug wrote:
Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
: “I'm not an expert but I it mea…”
jackie wrote:
Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
: “what the heck does this mean? …”
City Hall Watch wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “When New Haven went through re…”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rowland Gives Blago Some Advice
    • Rell's Deposit
    • The Fate of Newspapers
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
      to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Atlantic Wire Pleads Guilty To Polluting Branford River
  • Education
    • Lobbying Season Starts Early At Capitol
    • UConn Hires Alternative Energy Experts
    • Cosby's message: Responsible parenting
      wrapped in hope and empowerment
  • Election 2008
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
    • No Censure, Just A Letter Of Disapproval
    • Dems Expected to Scold Lieberman Today
  • Environment
    • Hartford Landfill Closes
    • Is That Toy Safe?
    • Hartford Marathon Goes Orange and Green
  • General News
    • Free Cookies, Milk and Stickers
    • 35 Cents An Hour = Cleaner Dishes
    • Memories From 2008: A Year In Review
  • Health Care
    • Quizzed on Health Care
    • State Officials Insist Husky Network Is Adequate
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
    • Jobless Numbers Are Up And The Phone Keeps Ringing
    • Union Members Honor State Veterans
  • Legal
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Lawmaker Requests Inmate Information
    • Blumenthal May Stop Suing
  • Local Politics
    • WPCA Urged To Tackle Marshal Fees
    • Who Has The Power To Appoint?
    • Marshals' Sweetheart Deals Targeted
  • Media Matters
    • Two Dailies Saved
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • WTIC Layoffs Have One Sponsor
      Questioning His Support
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • CTNewsJunkie wants your opinions
    • Curious Delivery Made To Press Room
    • Op-Ed: Speaking Out Against A Constitutional Convention
  • State Capitol
    • Speaker Amann Hands Over The Gavel
    • Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
      to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
    • Williams On Upcoming Budget Talks:
      If It Costs Money, It's 'Dead On Arrival'
  • Transportation
    • Rell: Scale Back Rail Project
    • TSB To Study Tolls

Questions Linger About New Haven Rail Yard

by Christine Stuart | June 27, 2008 5:15 PM
Posted to State Capitol

Christine Stuart photo

Two legislative committees met Friday in attempt to find out why the cost of a commuter rail maintenance center in New Haven has skyrocketed from $300 million to $1.2 billion, but many walked away without answers.

Sen. William Nickerson, R-Greenwich said the legislature wants to know, “How did these cost estimates balloon at such a rapid rate?” But the Department of Transportation officials and the consultant hired last year to conduct a value engineering study of the project were unable to answer those questions.

Lawmakers were also surprised that Friday was the first time they were handed the value engineering study completed by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin in February. “We have never seen this before today,” Nickerson said. “I think we should have seen this sooner.”

Christine Stuart photo

The existence of the value engineering study led Nickerson to ask Deputy Transportation Department Commissioner James Boice what the difference between this study and the one the Office of Policy and Management plans to undertake. Boice was unable to answer the question because he said he was unfamiliar with the scope of the second consultant’s work.

Gov. M. Jodi Rell ordered the Office of Policy and Management in April, shortly after the legislature learned about the ballooning costs of the project, to hire a consultant to review the scope, design, constructability of the rail yard project. In this June 15 press release, Rell’s office announced that Hill International, Inc. was hired to study those issues in addition to reviewing the DOT’s cost estimation policies, design and constructability.

The state will spend $630,000 for Hill International, Inc. to review the project. Members of the two committees learned Friday that of the 51 suggestions made by VHB, the first consultant, 33 could save the state about $63 million. VHB was unable to put a price tag on about 18 of the 51 recommendations and the DOT decided it would only incorporate about $11 million of the recommendations.

Rep. Edward Moukawsher, D-Groton, said Friday that $63 million in savings out of a $1.2 billion project, “is disappointing to me.”

“Frankly, this is the blackhole of our transportation funds,” he said. “It eliminates our ability to bond for other projects.”

Sen. Eileen Daily, D-Westbrook, said, “We want a Chevy, not a Lexus.”

DOT Project Engineer Scott Hill said Friday that “we weren’t doing this in a vacuum.” He said the legislature is getting a “Chevy, not the Cadillac.”

The Democrat-controlled legislature announced early this year that they were not going to recommend any new state borrowing for the project until the administration reassessed all transportation projects estimated in 2005 and 2006.

The rail yard upgrade was approved in 2005 to accommodate the new fleet of 300 M8 train cars that will begin arriving next year.