Recent Comments

Tim Follert wrote:
Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
: “A crime is a crime no matter t…”
Doug wrote:
Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
: “I'm not an expert but I it mea…”
jackie wrote:
Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
: “what the heck does this mean? …”
City Hall Watch wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “When New Haven went through re…”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rowland Gives Blago Some Advice
    • Rell's Deposit
    • The Fate of Newspapers
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
      to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Atlantic Wire Pleads Guilty To Polluting Branford River
  • Education
    • Lobbying Season Starts Early At Capitol
    • UConn Hires Alternative Energy Experts
    • Cosby's message: Responsible parenting
      wrapped in hope and empowerment
  • Election 2008
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
    • No Censure, Just A Letter Of Disapproval
    • Dems Expected to Scold Lieberman Today
  • Environment
    • Hartford Landfill Closes
    • Is That Toy Safe?
    • Hartford Marathon Goes Orange and Green
  • General News
    • Free Cookies, Milk and Stickers
    • 35 Cents An Hour = Cleaner Dishes
    • Memories From 2008: A Year In Review
  • Health Care
    • Quizzed on Health Care
    • State Officials Insist Husky Network Is Adequate
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
    • Jobless Numbers Are Up And The Phone Keeps Ringing
    • Union Members Honor State Veterans
  • Legal
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Lawmaker Requests Inmate Information
    • Blumenthal May Stop Suing
  • Local Politics
    • WPCA Urged To Tackle Marshal Fees
    • Who Has The Power To Appoint?
    • Marshals' Sweetheart Deals Targeted
  • Media Matters
    • Two Dailies Saved
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • WTIC Layoffs Have One Sponsor
      Questioning His Support
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • CTNewsJunkie wants your opinions
    • Curious Delivery Made To Press Room
    • Op-Ed: Speaking Out Against A Constitutional Convention
  • State Capitol
    • Speaker Amann Hands Over The Gavel
    • Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
      to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
    • Williams On Upcoming Budget Talks:
      If It Costs Money, It's 'Dead On Arrival'
  • Transportation
    • Rell: Scale Back Rail Project
    • TSB To Study Tolls

Rell’s Veto of Cabinet Stuns Lawmakers

by Christine Stuart | June 16, 2008 4:28 PM
Posted to State Capitol

Christine Stuart file photo

Aside from vetoing the health care pooling bill Friday, Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell stunned lawmakers by vetoing a bill that overwhelmingly passed in both the House and the Senate, without one Republican voting against it.

The bill would have created a 24-member cabinet to identify funding issues and develop state budget recommendations regarding nonprofit community providers that service about 500,000 individuals with disabilities and other needs.

Rell said the bill “establishes an unnecessary new level of administration and costs while interfering in the powers of both the legislative and executive branches of government.” However, Sen. Jonathan Harris, D-West Hartford, said Monday that he was “surprised and disappointed” in the governor’s veto because it specifically states twice in the bill that there is absolutely no cost to establishing the cabinet.

In fact, Harris said “the impetus for the bill to establish a cabinet in this area was based on the success of the governor’s Early Childhood cabinet.” Harris said the legislature “wanted to try and do the same thing for the community providers.”

He said the governor either didn’t read the bill or someone is advising her poorly.

Rell seemed to want to give the nonprofit organizations that serve children and adults with mental illness, developmental disabilities and substance use disorders, some tough love.

“Like many in both the public and private sectors, some of these providers have been struggling due to financial constraints. However, another bureaucracy will not solve these financial problems. It will only lead to additional costs for state government - and taxpayers,” Rell said in a press release. She said the efforts of the cabinet would infringe “upon executive branch and legislative authority.”

“A new Cabinet only becomes duplicative,” she said.

Sen. Gayle Slossberg, D-Milford, said “This was not a bureaucracy; this was a diagnostic tool and a means to keep nonprofits afloat and protect the state from incurring even greater costs.”

She said, “It’s unfortunate that, instead of being part of the solution, the governor is choosing to put her head in the sand and pretend the problem doesn’t exist. That’s a loss for the state of Connecticut.”

Harris said the veto was a “slap in the face to private providers,” that provide services to the state’s most vulnerable citizens for less money than the state would be able to, if it had to take over these services.

Harris said it was a constructive way, at no cost to the taxpayers, to deal with the lack of funding the community providers have received over the past few years.

The Community Providers Association sent out a press release Monday afternoon asking the legislature to address this bill during its June 23 veto session.

Terry Edelstein, president and CEO of the Community Providers Association, said “Governor Rell’s continued reluctance to help provide proper funding to help our clients is troubling particularly at a time when these services are in greatest demand.”

She said, “Despite the Governor’s decision, we will continue to work with legislators of both parties to over-ride her veto and work toward a model that provides adequate funding for programs that serve our clients.”

In addition Edelstein said the group will continue to ask for a meeting with the governor to explain its clients’ needs to her directly.

Click here to read Rell’s veto message.

Comments (4)

Posted by: TrueBlueCT [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 16, 2008 7:22 PM

Who pissed in Grandma Rell's Cheerios?

First she vetoes the minimum wage adjustment, then the health care plan, now this?

Cold-hearted conservatism at its worst!

Posted by: CT Guy | June 17, 2008 12:34 PM

Is it just me or does Rell remind anyone else of Mom from Futurama?

http://animatedtv.about.com/od/futurama/ig/Futurama-Pictures/Futurama---Mom.htm

Posted by: Jodzilla | June 17, 2008 3:21 PM

Wow. To think I voted for her. Gov. Rell, you need to read these bills before you veto them. We are all tightening our belt...but the State employees got a 5% plus bonuses this year. How did that happen?

Posted by: map | July 1, 2008 11:28 AM

Did anyone else read her response? "This will add costs.. this will add costs.. this will add costs... this is MY job and it will add costs."

It was specifically stated in the bill that it would NOT add costs. Either Rell is thinking awfully far ahead or she just feels like she has to make all these funding cut decisions on her lonesome. Sometimes it really isn't better to just do things yourself.

Sure is making herself unpopular of late isn't she?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)