Recent Comments

christine wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Thanks Martha. I know he's pus…”
Johnny wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Its nice to see that Rell has …”
Martha H. wrote:
Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills: “Christine, Don't know all of …”
Lothar wrote:
Local Leaders Express Concern About Lack of Budget: “Richard that's not the issue n…”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rell Kills Bill
    • Treading Water Is Getting Tougher In Connecticut
    • Looks Like It's Been Off For A While. . .
  • Congress
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • Joe: No Go On 'Public Option'
  • Corporate Watch
    • Banks Committee Begins With Little Fanfare
      AIG Executive Answers Few Questions
    • AIG Executive To Testify Thursday
    • Lawmakers Frustrated By AIG 'Compliance'
  • Courts
    • Senor Pancho's Owner Pleads Guilty
    • 'If You Work Hard You Can Succeed In America'
    • Supreme Court Overturns City on Ricci
  • Education
    • Programs Scaled Back Without Budget In Place
    • A Year Later, Still Waiting For Education Ruling
    • Students Lobby For Opportunity To Sit On School Board
  • Election 2008
    • With Obama, De'Vonna Solemnly Swears
    • Hairdresser Scores Ticket To History
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
  • Election 2010
    • Scully's Departure From Amann Campaign
      Leaves More Questions Than Answers
    • State Elections Watchdog To Retire
    • Q-Poll: Dodd Shows Gains, Simmons Still Strong
  • Environment
    • Developer Aims High As He Waits For
      Rell To Sign Green Tax Credit Bill
    • Dairy Farmers Celebrate Legislative Victory
    • Bill Would Ban Lions, Bears, and Chimps
  • General News
    • Foiled Again! Polka Bill Dies During Legislative Session
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
    • State Won't Charge Cromwell Lawmaker
  • Health Care
    • Dodd Praised For Tobacco Legislation
    • Dodd Unveils Public Option, Says It Lowers Price Tag
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • Paid Sick Days Bill Passes House
    • Nursing Home Strike Canceled
    • Senate Gives Final Passage To Union Deal
  • Legal
    • Blumenthal Sides With Catholic Church
    • Governor Signs 'Madoff' Bill
    • Bill Seeks To Protect Consumers From Scams
  • Local Politics
    • A Garden Grows. Do The Children?
    • Municipal Leaders Request Meeting
      With State Budget Negotiators
    • Marshal Forced To Lower Fees In New Haven
  • Media Matters
    • JRC Boss Hangs Up Hatchet
    • A Sentinel Remembered--& Welcomed
    • Next for news?
      Introducing the Valley Independent Sentinel
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • OP-ED: SustiNet Awaits Action In The Senate
    • Op-Ed: Smoking Ban Would Cost State
    • OP-ED: Time to Get Tough On Credit Card Companies
  • State Capitol
    • Taking A Break From The Budget
    • Gov. Rell Vetoes Seven Bills
    • HIV/AIDS Funding At Risk?
  • Transportation
    • New Rail Cars Fail First Test, Officials Not Worried
    • 40 Percent Bus 'Tax' Blasted
    • Debate On Open Containers Stalls In House

Rell’s Veto of Cabinet Stuns Lawmakers

by Christine Stuart | June 16, 2008 4:28 PM
Posted to State Capitol

Christine Stuart file photo

Aside from vetoing the health care pooling bill Friday, Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell stunned lawmakers by vetoing a bill that overwhelmingly passed in both the House and the Senate, without one Republican voting against it.

The bill would have created a 24-member cabinet to identify funding issues and develop state budget recommendations regarding nonprofit community providers that service about 500,000 individuals with disabilities and other needs.

Rell said the bill “establishes an unnecessary new level of administration and costs while interfering in the powers of both the legislative and executive branches of government.” However, Sen. Jonathan Harris, D-West Hartford, said Monday that he was “surprised and disappointed” in the governor’s veto because it specifically states twice in the bill that there is absolutely no cost to establishing the cabinet.

In fact, Harris said “the impetus for the bill to establish a cabinet in this area was based on the success of the governor’s Early Childhood cabinet.” Harris said the legislature “wanted to try and do the same thing for the community providers.”

He said the governor either didn’t read the bill or someone is advising her poorly.

Rell seemed to want to give the nonprofit organizations that serve children and adults with mental illness, developmental disabilities and substance use disorders, some tough love.

“Like many in both the public and private sectors, some of these providers have been struggling due to financial constraints. However, another bureaucracy will not solve these financial problems. It will only lead to additional costs for state government - and taxpayers,” Rell said in a press release. She said the efforts of the cabinet would infringe “upon executive branch and legislative authority.”

“A new Cabinet only becomes duplicative,” she said.

Sen. Gayle Slossberg, D-Milford, said “This was not a bureaucracy; this was a diagnostic tool and a means to keep nonprofits afloat and protect the state from incurring even greater costs.”

She said, “It’s unfortunate that, instead of being part of the solution, the governor is choosing to put her head in the sand and pretend the problem doesn’t exist. That’s a loss for the state of Connecticut.”

Harris said the veto was a “slap in the face to private providers,” that provide services to the state’s most vulnerable citizens for less money than the state would be able to, if it had to take over these services.

Harris said it was a constructive way, at no cost to the taxpayers, to deal with the lack of funding the community providers have received over the past few years.

The Community Providers Association sent out a press release Monday afternoon asking the legislature to address this bill during its June 23 veto session.

Terry Edelstein, president and CEO of the Community Providers Association, said “Governor Rell’s continued reluctance to help provide proper funding to help our clients is troubling particularly at a time when these services are in greatest demand.”

She said, “Despite the Governor’s decision, we will continue to work with legislators of both parties to over-ride her veto and work toward a model that provides adequate funding for programs that serve our clients.”

In addition Edelstein said the group will continue to ask for a meeting with the governor to explain its clients’ needs to her directly.

Click here to read Rell’s veto message.

Comments (4)

Posted by: TrueBlueCT [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 16, 2008 7:22 PM

Who pissed in Grandma Rell's Cheerios?

First she vetoes the minimum wage adjustment, then the health care plan, now this?

Cold-hearted conservatism at its worst!

Posted by: CT Guy | June 17, 2008 12:34 PM

Is it just me or does Rell remind anyone else of Mom from Futurama?

http://animatedtv.about.com/od/futurama/ig/Futurama-Pictures/Futurama---Mom.htm

Posted by: Jodzilla | June 17, 2008 3:21 PM

Wow. To think I voted for her. Gov. Rell, you need to read these bills before you veto them. We are all tightening our belt...but the State employees got a 5% plus bonuses this year. How did that happen?

Posted by: map | July 1, 2008 11:28 AM

Did anyone else read her response? "This will add costs.. this will add costs.. this will add costs... this is MY job and it will add costs."

It was specifically stated in the bill that it would NOT add costs. Either Rell is thinking awfully far ahead or she just feels like she has to make all these funding cut decisions on her lonesome. Sometimes it really isn't better to just do things yourself.

Sure is making herself unpopular of late isn't she?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)