Recent Comments

Tim Follert wrote:
Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
: “A crime is a crime no matter t…”
Doug wrote:
Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
: “I'm not an expert but I it mea…”
jackie wrote:
Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
: “what the heck does this mean? …”
City Hall Watch wrote:
Local Officials to Lawmakers: Don't Cut State Aid
& Give Us Choices
: “When New Haven went through re…”

Categories

  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Cartoons
    • Rowland Gives Blago Some Advice
    • Rell's Deposit
    • The Fate of Newspapers
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
      to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Atlantic Wire Pleads Guilty To Polluting Branford River
  • Education
    • Lobbying Season Starts Early At Capitol
    • UConn Hires Alternative Energy Experts
    • Cosby's message: Responsible parenting
      wrapped in hope and empowerment
  • Election 2008
    • Connecticut Dems Vent Against Lieberman
    • No Censure, Just A Letter Of Disapproval
    • Dems Expected to Scold Lieberman Today
  • Environment
    • Hartford Landfill Closes
    • Is That Toy Safe?
    • Hartford Marathon Goes Orange and Green
  • General News
    • Free Cookies, Milk and Stickers
    • 35 Cents An Hour = Cleaner Dishes
    • Memories From 2008: A Year In Review
  • Health Care
    • Quizzed on Health Care
    • State Officials Insist Husky Network Is Adequate
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
  • Iraq at Home
    • West Hartford Movie Night
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
  • Labor
    • All They Want For Christmas Is Health Care
    • Jobless Numbers Are Up And The Phone Keeps Ringing
    • Union Members Honor State Veterans
  • Legal
    • Terror Case Convict Appeals To Judge
    • Lawmaker Requests Inmate Information
    • Blumenthal May Stop Suing
  • Local Politics
    • WPCA Urged To Tackle Marshal Fees
    • Who Has The Power To Appoint?
    • Marshals' Sweetheart Deals Targeted
  • Media Matters
    • Two Dailies Saved
    • Governing Magazine: Connecticut's Capitol Coverage
    • WTIC Layoffs Have One Sponsor
      Questioning His Support
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • Opinion
    • CTNewsJunkie wants your opinions
    • Curious Delivery Made To Press Room
    • Op-Ed: Speaking Out Against A Constitutional Convention
  • State Capitol
    • Speaker Amann Hands Over The Gavel
    • Judiciary Committee OKs Adding Race
      to Deliberations on Criminal Justice Laws
    • Williams On Upcoming Budget Talks:
      If It Costs Money, It's 'Dead On Arrival'
  • Transportation
    • Rell: Scale Back Rail Project
    • TSB To Study Tolls

Senate Goes Forward with DeLuca Investigation

by Christine Stuart | August 22, 2007 3:38 PM
Posted to State Capitol

Chistine Stuart photo

The state Senate voted 33-0 Wednesday on a resolution to create a six-member panel to investigate Republican Senator Louis DeLuca’s association with Danbury trash-hauler James Galante, who he asked to threaten his granddaughter’s husband.

Senate President Donald Williams and Senate Minority Leader John McKinney made brief comments on how the bipartisan committee will be organized, before DeLuca stood up to address his colleagues.

In his speech on the Senate floor, DeLuca said he will cooperate fully with the panel’s inquiry. He said he trusts the committee will proceed in a “fair and responsible manner.” DeLuca then recused himself from the vote, but said later that if he was able to vote, he probably would have voted in favor of the resolution.

DeLuca did have one criticism of the resolution. He said it should have included more rules and standards for how the committee will proceed.

Following the Senate vote DeLuca held a press conference in which he explained how he never specifically offered the help of his office to Galante. He said he told the FBI agent, who he thought was Galante’s associate, that he would “do what he could to help Galante’s family.”

According to the arrest warrant affidavit, in Sept. 2006 an undercover federal agent, posing as a business associate of Galante, met with DeLuca. At that meeting DeLuca told the agent, “anytime [Businessman A] needs anything, anything, within my power, that I can do, I will do.” DeLuca then told the agent he was shocked when Galante was indicted because he “is not a careless guy.” Then DeLuca advised the agent that if they needed his assistance the best way to contact him is through a specific individual because “nobody knows [about] that relationship.”

Two days later DeLuca met with the undercover agent again. The agent asked DeLuca to influence legislation to help Galante. DeLuca said, “I can’t influence it at this point because it’s out of my hands, but if it gets to the point where I have appointments, I can influence it that way. You know, if somebody, if it’s a commission that needs to be in that, that, is gonna be a watchdog on CRRA and make recommendations then I’ll make an appoint…generally I get an appointment.”

During Wednesday’s press conference DeLuca also took it upon himself to explain all the media’s mistakes in covering his situation. He said he wanted to specify that when he met with Galante, Galante was not indicted by the feds. And he said Galante only paid tribute to the mafia, “it didn’t say he was part of the organization.”

The six-member committee will be named within the next few days, Williams said. He said the committee will be tasked with reviewing the entire public record concerning the events leading up to DeLuca’s guilty plea on the misdemeanor charge of conspiracy to commit threatening in the second degree.

DeLuca said he will appear before the committee.

Williams went onto explain that the committee can make one of four recommendations to the full Senate. The recommendations include, no action, reprimand, censure, or explusion. He said if the recommendation is explusion then DeLuca may request a heaing be held before the full Senate prior to any action by the Senate.

McKinney said to “sit in judgment of a colleague,” is not “easy,” however, “it’s about doing the right thing.”

Comments (2)

Posted by: ctkeith | August 23, 2007 8:49 AM

DeLuca admitted in his own words to committing at least 2 felonies in his plea agreement.

The Ct State Senate itself is on trial here. Anything less than a vote for expulsion will forever tarnish the institution.

Posted by: Christine | August 23, 2007 6:29 PM

Colin McEnroe brings up a good point Thursday...Why is the committee only investigating what's in the public record? In the federal indictment of James Galante we find out they used "Joe Smoes" to front campaign donations to politicians....This implies more than one politician was on the take from the trash hauling thugs. Who else in office is being influenced by the mob?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)