Recent Comments

laureen malone wrote:
Updated: Special Session Next Week: “First of all The petits are fr…”
Steven G. Erickson wrote:
Updated: Special Session Next Week: “I just emailed all the elected…”

Categories

  • Cartoons
    • Rell and Her Vetoes
    • Moral Compass
    • Gas Prices on the Rise
  • Corporate Watch
    • Big Oil Drank Your Stimulus Check
    • Blumenthal Tells Internet Company to Stop Snooping
    • Public's Right-to-Know Prevails
  • Courts
    • In Foreclosure, Judge's Hands Tied
    • Fighting Foreclosure on Cornwall Street
    • Challenging Connecticut's Bail Bond System. Is it Constitutional?
  • CT Elections 2006
    • Closure on 2006 Democratic Primary
    • Daily Kos Poll Finds Many in CT Would Change Vote
    • Edited: Waxing Nostalgic
  • Election 2008
    • Third Party Convention Held This Weekend
    • Flip-Flop Flap in 5th Congressional Race
    • Vote, Baby, Vote!
  • Environment
    • Environmental Groups Mad at Rell's Proposed Changes
    • Wind Turbines Pitched In New Haven
    • DeLauro Sees 'Perfect Storm' on Oil
  • General News
    • Rell Delivers The Check to Common Ground
    • Kirkley-Bey on ending the cycle of violence in Hartford
    • City Youth Strut Their Stuff
  • Health Care
    • Rell Prepared to Ignore Council's Recommendation
    • Decision To Join Charter Oak
      Not Easy For State Hospital
    • Five More Hospitals Enroll In Charter Oak
  • Iraq at Home
    • Five Years of War
    • Hartford Passes Anti-War Resolution...5 Years Too Late?
    • Lindorff Makes a Case for Impeachment
  • Labor
    • Yale-New Haven Hospital Hands Union $2M
    • Fighting to Keep Living Wage Law in Manchester
    • Protesters Dog Hartford Schools Superintendent as Unions Fight Tooth and Nail for Jobs, Benefits
  • Legal
    • "Democracy Victory" At VA
    • Challenging Connecticut's Bail Bond System. Is it Constitutional?
    • News Analysis: FOI Request Reveals How School Officials Came Across the "Douche Bag" Comment
  • Local Politics
    • Clergy and Gov's Office Weigh in on Hartford Violence
    • Hartford Rallies Against Violence
    • Hartford Mayor Writes Governor and Chief Justice
  • Media Matters
    • New Haven Independent Interviewed in New York Times Story
    • Tell Zell Unveils Courant Buyout List
    • Newspaper Reductions Prompt Class Action
  • News Links
    • State Government Home Page
  • State Capitol
    • Republicans Will Try Again to Cap the Gas Tax
    • Growing Up Without a Dad; Legislative Group
      Begins Discussions on Impact of Fatherlessness
    • Politicians Agree What to Do With State Surplus

Updated: Special Session Next Week

by Christine Stuart | January 18, 2008 9:08 AM
Posted to State Capitol

CTNJ file photo

The General Assembly will convene its special session to reform the criminal justice system at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, Jan. 22.

While legislators don’t yet agree on three-strikes legislation, they do agree on a number of reforms that don’t require large budget appropriations. According to the Office of Fiscal Analysis the proposal is estimated to cost about $6.3 million in 2008 and $17.7 million in 2009.

“These proposals include establishing a new crime of ‘home invasion’ and classifying it as a violent crime; re-writing the state’s persistent offender statutes so career criminals serve more time in prison, and fixing the state’s broken parole system which has been described as a ‘total failure’,” Senate President Don Williams said Thursday in a press release.

Read the Office of Legislative Research’s analysis of the legislation here.

Gov. M. Jodi Rell has said that things such as prison re-entry programs will require an investment from the state and should be discussed during the budget adjustment session that begins Feb. 6. But based on the above proposal it looks like Democrats want to start funding some of the programs and reforms immediately.

Comments (2)

Posted by: Steven G. Erickson | January 21, 2008 12:32 AM

I just emailed all the elected officials on the Connecticut Judiciary Committee.

I let be known my thoughts on the Cheshire home invasion, how I think legislators only seem to act in behalf of the Blue Blood Elite, and asked whether the US Constitution still applies or not.

Posted by: laureen malone | February 15, 2008 5:50 PM

First of all The petits are from a working class family in plainville that owned a trinket store in town for years. Mrs Petit hawke dad was a minister and they were middle class folks down to earth good people. I am so so tired and disgusted by you people and even certain legislators who are so insensitive and cruel and disrespectful to the surviving Dr Petit, who because he happens to have worked his butt of to get thru medicial school in order to become a healer from people like you, has now become a symbol for what you percive as special treatment he as a victim of crime is getting from the system that failed him utterly. A heinous crime like this should be bringing people together but it seems that there is always this part of the citizenry who is petty and so full of ill will and envy for what they percieve that others may have- which they do not, that you seemingly lay in wait for something awful to happen to people that you regard as different somehow from you ie blue blood or affluent rich' Isnt this the very thing that you purportedly complain about-racism or classism?!
YOU start pointing fingers AFTER the horrific aftermath of tragic multiple rapes and murders of a mother and her two children! This crime is in the spotlight of the state legisalture because it has so glaringly exposed gravely irresponsible actions and inactions within our states judicial system.Wake up!
This family could have been black yellow pink-the fact is it was a horrendous set of crimes that took out an entire family, save one person who was almost fatally injured himself and had to listen a his wife was garrotted on the floor above him-just as his daughters also had to listen to thier mom begging for her life just prior to them having gasoline poured on them and set aflame! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE!? These men that did this had been convicted of over 25 felonies betwen them-one just 26 years old! They were both paroled after one third and less than a half of thier collective sentences. This was done without either one even present in an "administrative parole" Classic for our parole system-this was done with next to no paperwork for the parole board to make this crucial life and death descision-and this for either criminal, including some very important sentencing transcripts for the younger of the two who was already showing sex criminal patterns within his many many home break ins-all done while the people were home-for the thrill" it gave him-his words)Both of them were serving what was already lenient sentences, one was caughtnwith contraand multiel times as well as being kicked out of halfway houses for breaking thier rules. They had no business being paroled, anfd the descision to parole them was done recklessly and it turns out this goes on all day long for years,So I hope your proud for planting the seed in some of these impressionable legislators minds that you feel that the only people that the state cares about are the wealthy bluebloods. Its simply imbecilic and utterly insensitive to all victims of crime no matter the color or class. These crimes transecend all of that, this is about what we all share not what sepeartes us and I am so sorry that you cand others like you fail to see this.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)