CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

Blumenthal: PIPA Is Seriously Flawed, Larson Still Supports SOPA

by | Jan 18, 2012 2:38pm () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Business

(Updated 3:38 p.m.) As a handful of websites went dark Wednesday in protest of two Internet piracy bills making their way through Congress, U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal said he would oppose the bill he co-sponsored unless “serious flaws” were corrected.

“I believe that online piracy and intellectual property theft is a very serious problem that needs to be addressed but I have steadfastly opposed SOPA and I believe that my conversations with advocates, experts and constituents have indicated serious flaws in the Protect Intellectual Property Act that need to be addressed and corrected,” Blumenthal said after an unrelated press conference in Hartford.

His comments came around the time websites like Mozilla, Wikipedia, MoveOn, Reddit, Wordpress, and 5,000 others lifted their 12-hour Internet strike protesting the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the House and PIPA, the Senate bill. According to Fight the Future, a non-profit dedicated to online rights, more 62,000 sites signed up for the strike on sopastrike.com. The group estimated that more than 10,000 were participating.

In December Blumenthal said PIPA aimed to “protect intellectual property from thieves.”

“It costs American jobs and Connecticut industries that depend on their intellectual property,” he said.

Currently, foreign websites are in “flagrant violation of the protections that apply to websites here.” He said the legislation targets foreign websites dedicated to “infringing activities defined under the law as having no significant use other than engaging in copyright infringement.”

But technology companies, including Facebook, Google, and Mozilla say the bills go too far and will impact the basic structure of the Internet, including domestic websites.

On Wednesday Blumenthal conceded the bill may be too broad, limiting free expression, innovation and creative spirit. It may also alter the architecture of the Internet, he said.

“I would oppose the Protect Intellectual Property Act if those flaws are not addressed and corrected,” he said.

Blumenthal agreed with U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, who called on Congress to scrap SOPA and start over. Courtney, who had previously been on the fence on the issue, released a statement Tuesday saying problems with SOPA should be corrected with “an axe instead of a scalpel.”

“... this bill would unacceptably and fundamentally change the architecture of the internet,” he said.

However, Blumenthal said PIPA can be reworked to correct its flaws. Still, he wasn’t counting on either bill clearing Congress this year.

“My current expectation is that passage this year is unlikely,” he said.

That news would likely disappoint Blumenthal’s predecessor former U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd, who now heads the Motion Picture Association of America. Dodd has been the main proponent of both pieces of legislation. In a Tuesday statement, he condemned the planned Internet blackout.

“A so-called ‘blackout’ is yet another gimmick, albeit a dangerous one, designed to punish elected and administration officials who are working diligently to protect American jobs from foreign criminals,” Dodd said.

He said the MPAA hoped Congress and the White House would call on the websites to stop using PR Stunts. But it was a White House statement that emboldened the sites to stage the blackout.

The blackout forced some lawmakers to take sides, while others were asked to clarify their positions.

U.S. Rep. Jim Himes said he never supported SOPA because it’s “far too blunt an instrument” that could destroy the vibrancy and free speech of the Internet. The way the bill is drafted also raises cybersecurity concerns, he said in a phone interview Wednesday.

Himes marveled at the blackout as a form of “advocacy unlike anything I’ve seen before.”

“My Twitter feed has been fast and furious all day,” Himes said.

He said the blackout allowed people who weren’t following the issue to become aware of it. In the end he thinks there’s a responsible approach Congress can take to “square the circle so Hollywood doesn’t continue to do battle with Palo Alto.”

He said some of that approach may be in the Open Act. The Open Act was proposed by opponents of SOPA to solve the same Internet piracy issues using more measured approaches.

Still some lawmakers are still concerned all of the piracy legislation is aimed at a problem that doesn’t exist.

In a conference call with reporters, U.S. Rep. John Larson, the only member of the Connecticut delegation to sign on as a co-sponsor of SOPA, said the people at Google and Wikipedia deserved a “tip of the hat” for their grassroots movement. Larson said he still supported the bill but said there is room for compromise.

“Nobody wants to impact the robust nature of the Internet and the freedom it provides,” he said. “... There are less restrictive ways to accomplish the same ends.”

Larson said his office has received a number of calls asking that the bill not move forward. However, he said online piracy is an issue that needs to be addressed. The U.S. economy loses $58 billion annually as a result of the practice, which he said impacts 19 million people in the intellectual property industry.

The bill is currently in the mark up phase of the legislative process and will change and evolve in ways that will hopefully address some of the concerns, he said. Larson said based on the push back, Blumenthal’s assessment that the bill was unlikely to pass this year was probably fair.

“In this Congress any piece of legislation faces enormous difficulty,” he said.

The need to address online piracy, however won’t go away, he said.

“The salient issue of protecting intellectual property rights and the enormous economic loss to the nation will remain the same,” he said.

U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman’s office reaffirmed his support for PIPA, saying he is still co-sponsoring the legislation.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy expressed his support for the Senate’s Protect IP Act in June in this letter to Blumenthal.

“Since Connecticut’s tax incentive for film and digital media became effective in July 2006, the state has become a prime production location,” Malloy wrote.

Intellectual property piracy costs the global economy an estimated $650 billion a year, he wrote. On Wednesday, Andrew Doba, Malloy’s spokesman, said there are legitimate issues on both sides of the debate.

“We have a thriving film and television industry that brings jobs and millions of dollars to our state, and we have to protect it,” Doba said in an email. “At the same time, we can’t stifle emerging new media organizations. The governor will work with the delegation to find a legislative solution that strikes this balance.”

Tags: , , ,

Share this story with others.

Comments

(5) Archived Comments

posted by: Disgruntled | January 18, 2012  4:59pm

Dick pulled in $154,066 and has changed his mind (probably not for long),Larson $35,150 and Lieberman…well. Joe was bought and paid for a long time ago.
Connecticut “attracts” the film industry with tax credits that are important to the insurance industry that trades them so that they can make money. What sloppy seconds in terms of revenue are spread out to hotels,sandwich shops and the like. WE PAY COMPANIES TO SHOOT IN THIS STATE…for what? Bragging rights?
As for the legislation,ANYTHING that the criminal Chris Dodd proposes should be avoided as one would yellow snow or lawn sausages.

posted by: ... | January 18, 2012  5:07pm

...

58 billion dollars for 19 million people is worthless compared to the rights of 300+ million citizens, and billions more in damage to websites (both for and not for profit), advertising groups, and the spread of information to those without the means of accessing it.

posted by: Aldon_Hynes | January 18, 2012  5:20pm

Aldon_Hynes

If expressing my opposition to what I believe is flawed legislation that endangers freedom of speech in the Internet Era by blacking out my website is a ‘PR Stunt’, then I encourage more people to participate in PR Stunts. 

After all, as a Former Senator from Connecticut once said, “When the public’s right to know is threatened, and when the rights of free speech and free press are at risk, all of the other liberties we hold dear are endangered.”

posted by: saramerica | January 18, 2012  11:18pm

saramerica

Oh silly Aldon…that was BEFORE he started working for the MPAA. Now it’s DIFFERENT.

posted by: GoatBoyPHD | January 19, 2012  4:00am

GoatBoyPHD

I don’t believe Chris Dodd’s politics have changed. He can speak directly now without pandering to fools.

“All your copyrights and royalties are belong to us. Make your own vidoes and distribute them any way you see fit.”

How’s that National Digital Library thing coming Chris? You know the one where coyright laws are rewritten to make content available to rich and poor through a national digital streaming and download service?

Connecticut Network

Categories

Our Partners

Sponsored Messages