CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

Largest Education Association Endorses Malloy After One Committee Says Not To Endorse

by | Sep 29, 2014 2:27pm () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Education, Election 2014

Christine Stuart file photo Connecticut’s largest teacher’s union endorsed Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s re-election bid after closed-door interviews with Malloy, his Republican challenger Tom Foley and Joe Visconti.

The Connecticut Education Association announced the endorsement Monday, joining the American Federation of Teachers, the state’s second largest teachers union, in backing Malloy despite clashing with Democrat during his first term.

In making the endorsement, the 40-member board of directors for the teachers union differed with its political committee, which voted 8-7 approximately two weeks ago not to endorse any of the gubernatorial candidates.

Mark Waxenberg, executive director of the CEA, said it’s not that unusual for the board to disagree with its political committee. He said the board has not followed the recommendation of the political committee in the past.

The last time there was a unanimous decision about a gubernatorial candidate was in 1990 when Lowell P. Weicker was running for governor.

The political committee also didn’t have the polling data available to them before they made their decision, Waxenberg said Monday. A poll of 3,000 of its 43,000 members found that pension funding stability, collective bargaining, and funding of public education were the most important issues.

“It’s obvious of the two candidates, which of the two is stronger to address the issues that our members find of the most interest to them in the next governor,” Waxenberg said.

But Malloy didn’t make the job of the teacher’s union easy when two years ago he said that in order for teachers to earn tenure “the only thing you have to do is show up for four years.”

“The teacher’s by-in-large years ago were insulted by the governor’s statement and felt disappointed,” Waxenberg said

“The extra effort on our part this year was not to ignore the emotionalism,” Waxenberg said. “We tried to look at the two individuals running for governor and see where they stand on the facts.”

Waxenberg added that he didn’t believe there was any member of the board of directors who was voting for Foley. He said there were just a few of the members who felt the board shouldn’t endorse either of the candidates.

“Some people even said I’m voting for Malloy, I just don’t want to endorse,” Waxenberg said. “That became the emotional argument.”

Foley’s statements last week about education policy made Malloy’s endorsement easier to deliver to the board, Waxenberg said.

Last week, as part of his urban strategy, Foley said he would fix underperforming schools by mandating in-district school choice and implementing “money follows the child.”

Waxenberg said Foley’s “money follows the child” proposal would be “totally destabilizing to public education in the urban centers.”

CEA said it’s researched Foley’s proposal and concluded that if a Hartford student went to a Hartford charter school then it would cost the district an additional $8 million to send those upwards of 1,299 students to a charter school. Waxenberg said it would cost New Haven $13 million.

“Where are they going to get the money for that?” Waxenberg said. “It really is a recipe for disaster regarding how we fund public education in our state and the impact it would have on local communities.”

Earlier this month, Foley told about 230 CEA delegates, that he would develop a funding system to treat each student differently based on their skills and background.

“High performing kids are not expensive to educate,” Foley said, so they would receive lower amounts of state education funding than students who don’t perform well.

CEA said it didn’t have any specific numbers about how that part of Foley’s plan would impact local school districts, but it did an analysis of what it would happen to funding for public schools, if a child in that city of town attended a charter school. The total loss of money to local school districts would be about $39 million, according to CEA which focused solely on charter schools.

Foley maintained during his interview earlier this month with CEA that the state needs to spend more money on education and the distribution of that funding needs to be equitable.

“I have a plan for saving money in other areas of government and getting control over government spending so we can invest in things like education,” Foley said.

The videos of all three gubernatorial candidates speaking to CEA delegates were recently made public by the CEA on its website. This was the first year CEA held a forum to hear directly from the candidates. 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |


(8) Archived Comments

posted by: Bethy | September 29, 2014  5:14pm


CEA has a long positive history and strong reputation for representing its members. I feel that with their ongoing union leadership experiences, they’ve made the right choice to endorse Governor Malloy. I will say this again, teachers are a very important role in our children’s lives. A teacher’s voice is always recalled as children mature into adults (it is for me). My favorite subjects in elementary school, middle school and high school was always “English” and “Social Studies”...What I would do to bring those days back.  There is nothing like an old school teacher from the 1970’s. No offense to the teachers of today…I’m just recollecting those good old days (i was born in 1966)....Once again, I believe in my heart that CEA made the right decision.  I pray that all teachers join in.  Have a bless day everyone…

posted by: StateEmployee | September 29, 2014  7:30pm

Another Union where the E-Board supports Malloy, but not the membership does not.

posted by: art vandelay | September 29, 2014  9:50pm

art vandelay

Why am I not surprised.  Four years ago the CEA was out to hang Malloy, now they embrace him.  Politics makes strange bedfellows.

posted by: Not that Michael Brown | September 30, 2014  9:05am

Teachers don’t like copying off of other people’s papers.  They also don’t like union busting.  That’s why it was doubly bad for Foley to plagiarize the idea “money follows the child.”

posted by: GBear423 | September 30, 2014  3:38pm


Voting for a candidate while holding your nose is not an endorsement. Its not emotional either, its having to be pragmatic while holding onto principle.  The leadership here, like all unions, is thinking of keeping their pony in the show. 

Keep the devil that is beholden to you. They still have some leverage over democrats that goes unseen. They have not so much, if any, on Foley.

posted by: Linda12 | September 30, 2014  5:07pm

Malloy proposed the same plan in 2012 as Foley, money follows the child. Similar to many of his policies, Danny was for it before he was against it. He also followed the national deform plan set out by Gates and puppeted by Arne, while he attempts to shame Foley for copying the plans of others, he does the same.

Despite repeated cut and paste comments (all the same) from ONE state employee, whose job may depend on Malloy winning, many teachers wil not be voting for Dannel.

posted by: shinningstars122 | September 30, 2014  8:40pm


Linda after what Tom Foley said tonight at the debate in West Hartford I highly doubt that will happen.

He said it loud and clear let the money follow the child.

Plus he used the metaphor that education is a business.

Why would any public school teacher walk to the gallows when you know Foley will surely pull the rope?

posted by: OutBackJack312 | October 1, 2014  10:13am


As a member of CEA I am embarrassed by its leadership.  I will not be voting for Governor Malloy..  I’d rather vote in Foley (The Wolf) than Malloy (The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing)...

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network


Our Partners

Sponsored Messages