CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

Proposal to Change Handicapped Parking Signs Gets Mixed Reaction From Disability Community

by | Sep 23, 2015 4:30am () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Aging, Civil Liberties, Equality, Nonprofits, State Capitol

Elizabeth Regan There is disagreement within the disability community about efforts to update traditional handicapped parking signs to reflect what people can do instead of what they can’t.

The new logo would replace the current stick figure in a wheelchair with a sleeker wheelchair design that represents a person on the move.

“Words and images have meaning — they shape our worldview,” state Sen. Beth Bye, D-West Hartford, said at a press conference Tuesday at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford. “When we change this image that appears passive, to one that implies motion, we more accurately represent the reality that people with disabilities are mobile.”

The “Change the Sign. Change the Attitude” campaign is being spearheaded by an advocacy group, the Arc of Farmington Valley, or FAVARH. Executive Director Stephen Morris said the idea was brought to him by client Todd Theriault after it became law in New York.

“Our hope is that we can influence the public perception of people with accessibility needs,” Morris said. “By bringing attention to the issue we expect we will be able to emphasize to the general public that people they see as “handicapped” are in most ways just as capable as you and me.”

But some people with severe disabilities say the so-called accessible icon does not reflect their reality.

Stephen Mendelsohn, a disability rights advocate and leader of the anti-assisted suicide group Second Thoughts Connecticut, said in a press release that his group opposes changing the internationally-recognized symbol of access.

“The new symbol conveys a profound prejudice against those of us with severe disabilities who need things like power wheelchairs, attendant care, breathing support, and feeding tubes,” Mendelsohn said. “The message being sent is that while it is cool to be ‘able disabled,’ having a severe disability causes one to be a ‘burden.’”

Mendelsohn’s fellow advocate Cathy Ludlum said the current sign, which has been described as “blocky and rigid” by proponents of the change, is the more appropriate image.

“I AM blocky and rigid!” Ludlum said.

Ludlum has spinal muscular atrophy. She uses a motorized wheelchair.

A logo that evokes someone pushing toward the finish line of a race makes unnecessary judgments about those with more severe disabilities, according to Ludlum.

“The old symbol leaves everything up to the imagination,” she said. “The new symbol seems to say that independence has everything to do with the body, which it doesn’t. Independence is who you are inside.”

Second Thoughts Connecticut recommended advocacy efforts on the issue should instead revolve around the campaign’s other focus: changing the wording on signs from “handicapped” to “reserved” or “accessible.”

The group also cited bigger issues that need to be addressed, such as people parking in the access area adjacent to spaces reserved for those with disabilities.

Morris, however, said greater awareness through the Change the Sign campaign will help bring attention to many other problems experienced by those in the disability community.

“This isn’t the biggest or most challenging disability-related issue that we face in Connecticut, but it is important to self advocates like Todd (and the) 1,200-plus people that have signed our petition just since Sept. 1,” he said. “And we hope too that it can bring greater awareness to the larger disability-related issues that we do face, like the misuse of handicapped parking spots, like accessible buildings or inaccessible buildings that still abound in our community.”

The change has a broad coalition of support among Democratic and Republican lawmakers, the governor’s office, and the business community. Proponents say the proposal does not represent a cost to the taxpayer since the new logo would only be used for new construction or when an old sign needs to be replaced.

Jonathan Slifka, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s liaison to the disability community, spoke from his wheelchair at Tuesday’s press conference to say that he looks at the proposed icon as a way to alter people’s perception of those with disabilities as “sedentary, non productive individuals.”

“They, in fact, are not. I am an example of that, and I’ve seen so many people in my work that are shining examples of that, from people with physical disabilities to intellectual and developmental disabilities.”

Critics of changing the signage have cited potential conflicts with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires the use of the International Symbol of Access.

New York-based attorney and disability law specialist John Egan wrote in a blog post that the answer may lie in a provision of the 2010 ADA standards allowing for “alternate designs, products or technologies” that result in “substantially equivalent or greater accessibility.” However, he cautioned that the Department of Justice has not yet issued formal guidance on the issue.

Bye said the legislation will be introduced in the next session of the General Assembly.

“It’s not like we’re saying tomorrow we’re going to replace everything. This is going to take time,” she said. “It’s the beginning of the legislative process when we introduce this bill. We’ll have input from a lot of people. And maybe there will be adjustments.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |


(6) Archived Comments

posted by: watcherkat54 | September 23, 2015  5:28am

It is just another way for Danny Malloy to spend the taxpayer dollars.

posted by: MyOpinion | September 23, 2015  7:40am

Doesn’t the government have more pressing matters to take up that the picture on a sign? How about the abuse of people getting Handicap permits (that never expire), and the Doctors who sign off on them?  Way too many handicap permits issued!

posted by: dano860 | September 23, 2015  10:31am

Note: Permanent parking permits will expire in accordance with your Connecticut driver’s license or identification card depending on the type of license you have. If you do not have a Connecticut driver’s license or identification card, you must obtain one before you can obtain or renew a permanent parking permit.
This statement is from the DMV site. Permanent doesn’t mean permanent to them. Therefore any of the old “lifetime” permits are no good, the ones that don’t have a license plate number on them are obsolete too. We have a bunch of abusers in this state, ones that are using their long deceased parents permits. Why? Because nobody enforces the law. It goes back to the private property thing, the enforcement people have to be requested to ticket abusers there. At a town hall or public library it’s different but I doubt you will find those folks at a library.
My question is, will this change in signage change the perception, by many, of their being catered to in one case then expecting to be treated as an equal in other cases or situations?

posted by: JrH93 | September 24, 2015  11:26am

I find the proposed sign to appear as a mockery of those in a wheelchair, rather than raising awareness.

Instead of looking to change the sign, we should be looking to increase the penalties for those who park/take up the Handicap spaces for their own personal leisure when there are those who desperately need it and can’t access it.

posted by: osemasterofdoom | September 24, 2015  2:23pm


As long as the new signs are used to replace old ones, rather than doing a wholesale changeover that would cost tax dollars, the change is fine with me. 

I used to get upset when the legislature would deal with minutiae like this instead of the state’s real problems, but I finally realized that if they focus on the small stuff, it’s less time they have to REALLY screw up Connecticut.

posted by: Jack45 | September 25, 2015  7:51pm

The very best deterrent to bad parking behavior were signs I saw both in France and Italy, which were translated as “if you take my spot, please take my disability.”

Now, if that doesn’t cause someone to pause, I feel sorry for the person who is afflicted with such insensitivity.

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network


Our Partners

Sponsored Messages