CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

Simsbury’s Mary Glassman To Resign Next Month

by | Dec 1, 2014 2:43pm () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Simsbury

Hugh McQuaid Photo Longtime Simsbury First Selectwoman Mary Glassman announced Monday she will resign from her position in response to a vote by the town’s Board of Selectmen last week to cut her salary by 35 percent in the middle of her term.

Paid for by Stevenson4CT, Michele Berardo, Treasurer

Glassman, a Democrat who has twice run for lieutenant governor and has served as president of the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, called a press conference to say she would leave the post effective Jan. 2 after a total of almost 16 years in office.

The decision comes after a vote by the town’s Republican-controlled Board of Selectmen to cut her salary by 35 percent. In July, her salary would drop from about $114,000 to $75,000. The change, which also will reduce her retirement benefits, are based on recommendations from a consultant.

In a crowded conference room inside the Simsbury town offices, Glassman told reporters and supporters that the board’s decision to implement the pay cuts mid-term is potentially illegal and “a blatant violation of public trust.”

“The recent action of the Republican majority on the Board of Selectmen to cut my salary and impact my pension affects me personally and financially. What is most troubling is that the action the Republican board members took is a politically motivated abuse of power. It is a calculated step taken by the Republican Party that should trouble the people of Simsbury,” she said.

Glassman said she would not pursue legal action against the town.

During last week’s board of selectmen meeting, which can be viewed at SimsburyTV.org, the panel initially discussed implementing the salary cut at the start of the the term of whoever is elected to be the town’s next first selectman.

But some Republicans wrestled with the idea of paying Glassman at her current salary, in part for responsibilities that were being reassigned to other town employees.

“That job is being done by those other folks. So I struggled a lot with this. I just can’t — our fiduciary responsibility is to the town, whether it’s $16,000 or $6,000. I, in my heart, can’t justify spending money to do something twice when it’s being done once,” Deputy First Selectman Nancy Haase, a Republican, said.

Democratic Selectman Lisa Heavner protested during the meeting.

“You are within your rights. It’s certainly permitted by the charter, but I think this sends a terrible message for someone who runs,” she said. “Basically what it means, from this point forward someone who runs for office and wins has to have enough money to live without that salary to do this because that salary could be gone.”

Heavner said a Simsbury Republican majority once voted to give Republican First Selectman Tom Vincent a salary increase. Republicans on the board accused her of trying to make a political issue out of Glassman’s salary cut.

Haase said there were Republicans and Democrats on both sides of the salary increase for Vincent.

Hugh McQuaid Photo “Right now, in this very moment, the message and the discussion that we have is going to set the tone. And I think it’s our responsibility — right now — to watch very closely what we say,” Haase told Heavner.

Selectman Sean Askham, a Republican who voted against cutting Glassman’s salary in July, insisted it was not a political move. After Glassman recused herself, the vote was 3-2 — three Republicans against one Democrat and one Republican.

On Monday, Glassman insisted the cut was personal. She pointed out that her 2013 opponent, Haase, was among the selectmen to vote for the reduction.

Following Glassman’s press conference, the Republican selectmen said they were surprised and disappointed. They said the vote was not personally or politically motivated.

“I would say this is a sad day for the town,” Hasse said. “There’s much that we’ve accomplished together and this is a very sad day for our community.”

David Ryan, a Simsbury resident and Democrat, was among the onlookers at the press conference. He called the vote to reduce the salary “vindictive.” He said he did not believe the decision was made in an effort to save money for the town.

“The town is sitting on lots of cash. There’s no problem with the town and cash,” he said.

Asked what she planned to do after stepping down, Glassman said she did not yet know.

“You know of any job opportunities?” she asked.

Tags: , ,

Share this story with others.

Share | |

Comments

(7) Archived Comments

posted by: shinningstars122 | December 1, 2014  5:54pm

shinningstars122

Wow! Who thought up this one? Instead of actually winning an election how about we simply slash the First Selectman pay by 34%?

Hey it looks like it worked!

Lets see Simsbury’s budget is between $82 to $83 million;the current salary is a hair over 1/10th of a percent of the total budget, for the next two fiscal years.

I think we can all agree that is a substantial town budget.

It seems the GOP brain trust think they should lower the bar?

I mean seriously a manager of a Walmart makes more than 75K a year but hey if this is their new “strategy” all middle managers of the Farmington valley rejoice!

Think about folks so much more responsibility for the same of less pay?

We’ll see how the voters react to this stunt.

posted by: UConnHoop | December 1, 2014  7:48pm

As I understand it, the pay cut was scheduled to be effective July 1, 2015.  Therefore, it was not done halfway into Glassman’s term but rather with 4 months left in her term.  It seems like Glassman is using this as a pretext to leave office.

posted by: dano860 | December 1, 2014  8:49pm

From a conservatives point of view!
This was a poorly thought out action. The Selectmen that voted for the salary adjustment have done the community, they were elected to serve, an injustice.
Even the consultant recommended that the wage adjustment wait until the next election. I realize that being elected as the First Selectman in most Towns is a part time function but in Simsbury it is a full time function PLUS all of the late night meetings. The original salary is hardly excessive. There certainly isn’t any financial problem that warranted this. 
They have just lowered the threshold for all of future Selectman candidates. It also lowers their own standing. They come off as a few dolts that haven’t given much thought to the un intended consequences of their actions.
There must be an election to replace the First Selectman, that costs, and the person elected to replace her must be a Democrat.
I would have to agree with her about this being nothing more than a personal, political witch hunt. In the end they will be the ones with her broom stuck in their tails or as some would say, this will come back to bite them in the butt!

posted by: NoNonsense2014 | December 1, 2014  10:04pm

@UConnHoop: As I understand it (from an article on another site that had more details), the consultant on whose report this pay cut was based recommended changing the salary at the beginning of a new term. I don’t know what Simsbury’s Charter says, but in the town where I live the Charter states that the mayor’s salary cannot be adjusted during a current term of office.

posted by: art vandelay | December 2, 2014  1:04am

art vandelay

From what I understand, Republicans gained the majority in the last election. As a result the move is simply a power play to get her out of office.

Mary Glassman will land on her feet.
I’m sure Malloy will have a place for her in his administration come January.  She’s a dedicated public servant with many years of experience.  I wish her well in her future endeavors.

posted by: One and Done | December 2, 2014  3:29pm

She’s still overpaid.

Simsbury.  A child could run a town so complex.

posted by: RogueReporterCT | December 2, 2014  4:21pm

RogueReporterCT

This feels like redistricting in Texas, hardball gone a bit too far. Too often these days, politicians simply do what they can without asking whether they should. If they really thought about it, they would gain insight into why such a move hadn’t been tried before.

Social Networks We Use

Connecticut Network

Categories

Our Partners

Sponsored Messages

Paid for by Stevenson4CT, Michele Berardo, Treasurer