CT News Junkie

A Connecticut news site that understands the usual media offerings just…aren’t…enough.

The End Is Near For State Trooper Contract Negotiations

by | Jul 17, 2013 4:00pm () Comments | Commenting has expired | Share
Posted to: Health Care, Jobs, Labor, Legal, Pensions

State troopers have been working under an expired contract for more than a year, but that likely will change later this summer when an arbitration process draws to a close.

State troopers’ labor contract with the state expired in July 2012. A few months later, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s administration and the Connecticut State Police Union reached an impasse in the process of negotiating a new deal. The case was sent to an arbitrator to be resolved.

State Labor Relations Director Linda Yelmini said that reply briefs are due from both sides by Friday. Then it will be up to the arbitrator to make an award. After a decision is made, the legislature will have a 30-day opportunity from the next time they gavel into session to approve or reject the new contract. If lawmakers take no action, the contracts will go into effect, she said.

Yelmini said the language of the expired contract remains in effect until a new one is established.

Connecticut State Police Union President Andrew Matthews said the expired contract does not cover any wage increases for troopers.

Troopers last received a raise in the summer of 2011 when they were one of two state employee bargaining units to reject a two-year wage freeze under a concession agreement with the Malloy administration. 

Since then, the administration and the union have clashed over staffing levels and efforts to consolidate dispatch centers as well as initiatives to “civilianize” certain positions within the agency. Last year, the union voted no confidence in Public Safety Commissioner Reuben Bradford and state police Col. Danny Stebbins over the issues.

The union also asked a court to force the administration to adhere to a previously-ignored statute requiring a minimum number of state troopers. The case prompted Malloy to propose and later sign a bill which removed the requirement from statute.

On Wednesday, Matthews said that he was “cautiously optimistic” about the process, but declined to discuss the contract sticking points citing the ongoing arbitration process.

“What the union leadership does not want to do is impact that process,” he said.

In May, Matthews testified before a legislative panel investigating the agency’s staffing levels and told lawmakers that he was concerned the state was trying to remove off-duty use of patrol cars from troopers’ contracts.

Matthews said state police often respond to emergencies while they are off-duty because they hear calls broadcast over their vehicle’s radios. He told lawmakers he had a similar experience when he stopped to help a man having a medical emergency while he was using his patrol car off-duty.

“I would not have been doing CPR on the side of the road as my wife watched if I was in my personal vehicle going to the airport,” he said.

Connect with Hugh:

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Share this story with others.


(5) Archived Comments

posted by: ad_ebay | July 18, 2013  7:34am

Yet, when I was a dispatcher for the State Police, I was told repeatedly, “I can’t stay here at the accident.  I have my wife with me.”

Cops are cops.  The only reason to DEMAND a state car to take home is to save gas money. 

Let’s face it, it can be tedious to be in a paramilitary organization.  Lots of dress requirements and information to absorb first thing in the morning.  Some cops like to go right to their patrol area rather than show up for roll call and inspection.

Times are tougher than when the contract was written.  ALL state employees are taking it in the shorts.  Time to pony up.

posted by: Wiley Coyote | July 18, 2013  8:38am

The Troopers and their Leadership are out of touch with reality. They couldn’t vote for SEBAC and to give up their raises, although never required to in the past like all the other bargaining units. They NEED their take home vehicles otherwise they won’t stop to help anyone. Thanks, I’ll remember that if I see you in need on the side of the road.  Sorry, my own vehicle can’t stop to help you. Great role models.  I applaud Gov. Malloy for taking them out of the call centers, airport and casinos.  Get back on the road and earn your enormous salaries and fringe benefits and quit crying please.  Their President Andy Matthews is as bad as the politicians in this state. They all need a wake up call.

Give me a break!

posted by: mmal231294 | July 18, 2013  10:12am

Over-paid and over staffed. Let the layoffs begin please.

posted by: ASTANVET | July 18, 2013  11:38am

No more vehicles, no more free gas, no more resident state troopers, consolodate dispatch - if towns cannot protect their citizens they need to levy taxes on them to create a constable or police force of their own.  With their own requirements - training and equipment.  No more overtime highway construction jobs - DOT has enough lights on trucks to alert drivers to a construction site - time to re-write that law.  Time to shift to a defined contribution retirement rather than a defined benefit plan - or a hybrid - lots of ways to save money -

posted by: justsayin | July 18, 2013  12:28pm

I think ALL state employees should NOT be allowed to use state assets for personal reasons.

Connecticut Network


Our Partners

Sponsored Messages